{"id":485156,"date":"2018-06-11T12:06:50","date_gmt":"2018-06-11T16:06:50","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?guid=667d8c1b4e00feaf7a38e4936321cce6"},"modified":"2018-06-11T12:06:50","modified_gmt":"2018-06-11T16:06:50","slug":"new-bolometer-is-faster-simpler-and-covers-more-wavelengths","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=485156","title":{"rendered":"New bolometer is faster, simpler, and covers more wavelengths"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Bolometers, devices that monitor electromagnetic radiation through heating of an absorbing material, are used by astronomers and homeowners alike. But most such devices have limited bandwidth and must be operated at ultralow temperatures. Now, researchers say they&#8217;ve found a ultrafast yet highly sensitive alternative that can work at room temperature\u2014and may be much less expensive.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Bolometers, devices that monitor electromagnetic radiation through heating of an absorbing material, are used by astronomers and homeowners alike. But most such devices have limited bandwidth and must be operated at ultralow temperatures. Now, researchers say they&#8217;ve found a ultrafast yet highly sensitive alternative that can work at room temperature&mdash;and may be much less expensive.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":615444,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-485156","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/485156","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=485156"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/485156\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":485157,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/485156\/revisions\/485157"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/615444"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=485156"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=485156"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=485156"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}