{"id":486962,"date":"2018-06-14T21:36:52","date_gmt":"2018-06-15T01:36:52","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.sciencedaily.com\/releases\/2018\/06\/180614213652.htm"},"modified":"2018-06-14T21:36:52","modified_gmt":"2018-06-15T01:36:52","slug":"girls-with-high-level-of-vitamin-d-have-stronger-muscles","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=486962","title":{"rendered":"Girls with high level of vitamin D have stronger muscles"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Girls are stronger with higher levels of vitamin D, but the association was not found in boys. These are the results from a new large study from the Odense Child Cohort. According to the study&#8217;s first author, girls with low vitamin D have a 70 percent increased risk of being among the lowest 10 percent in a test for muscle strength. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Girls are stronger with higher levels of vitamin D, but the association was not found in boys. These are the results from a new large study from the Odense Child Cohort. According to the study&#8217;s first author, girls with low vitamin D have a 70 percent &#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":61,"featured_media":615444,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-486962","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/486962","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/61"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=486962"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/486962\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":486963,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/486962\/revisions\/486963"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/615444"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=486962"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=486962"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=486962"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}