{"id":487492,"date":"2018-06-18T16:38:56","date_gmt":"2018-06-18T20:38:56","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.sciencedaily.com\/releases\/2018\/06\/180618163856.htm"},"modified":"2018-06-18T16:38:56","modified_gmt":"2018-06-18T20:38:56","slug":"22000-year-old-panda-from-cave-in-southern-china-belongs-to-distinct-long-lost-lineage-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=487492","title":{"rendered":"22,000-year-old panda from cave in Southern China belongs to distinct, long-lost lineage"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Researchers who&#8217;ve analyzed ancient mitochondrial (mt)DNA isolated from a 22,000-year-old panda found in Cizhutuo Cave in the Guangxi Province of China &#8212; a place where no pandas live today &#8212; have revealed a new lineage of giant panda. The report shows that the ancient panda separated from present-day pandas 144,000 to 227,000 years ago, suggesting that it belonged to a distinct group not found today. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Researchers who&#8217;ve analyzed ancient mitochondrial (mt)DNA isolated from a 22,000-year-old panda found in Cizhutuo Cave in the Guangxi Province of China &#8212; a place where no pandas live today &#8212; have revealed a new lineage of giant panda. The report show&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":61,"featured_media":615444,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-487492","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/487492","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/61"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=487492"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/487492\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":487493,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/487492\/revisions\/487493"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/615444"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=487492"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=487492"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=487492"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}