{"id":492793,"date":"2018-07-02T07:01:11","date_gmt":"2018-07-02T11:01:11","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?guid=73a60693e86944c6909ffeb2ea957204"},"modified":"2018-07-02T07:01:11","modified_gmt":"2018-07-02T11:01:11","slug":"scanning-in-the-fourth-dimension-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=492793","title":{"rendered":"Scanning in the fourth dimension"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Three-dimensional (3-D) computed tomography is a widely used technology that visualizes an object&#8217;s external and internal structure by assembling a series of two-dimensional images taken sequentially across or around it. However, as anyone who has had a medical magnetic resonance imaging scan will recall, this type of 3-D reconstruction requires the subject to be motionless throughout the capture process, which can take minutes. Capturing a 3-D structure that changes or deforms over time is much more difficult, and existing approaches often yield reconstructions marred by image artifacts and partial surfaces.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Three-dimensional (3-D) computed tomography is a widely used technology that visualizes an object&#8217;s external and internal structure by assembling a series of two-dimensional images taken sequentially across or around it. However, as anyone who has had &#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":615444,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-492793","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/492793","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=492793"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/492793\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":492794,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/492793\/revisions\/492794"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/615444"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=492793"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=492793"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=492793"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}