{"id":504329,"date":"2018-08-03T07:38:34","date_gmt":"2018-08-03T11:38:34","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?guid=1754cae9f2a5561967f3c0f9b88f50f4"},"modified":"2018-08-03T07:38:34","modified_gmt":"2018-08-03T11:38:34","slug":"complexity-test-offers-new-perspective-on-small-quantum-computers","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=504329","title":{"rendered":"Complexity test offers new perspective on small quantum computers"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>State-of-the-art quantum devices are not yet large enough to be called full-scale computers. The biggest comprise just a few dozen qubits\u2014a meager count compared to the billions of bits in an ordinary computer&#8217;s memory. But steady progress means that these machines now routinely string together 10 or 20 qubits and may soon hold sway over 100 or more.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>State-of-the-art quantum devices are not yet large enough to be called full-scale computers. The biggest comprise just a few dozen qubits&mdash;a meager count compared to the billions of bits in an ordinary computer&#8217;s memory. But steady progress means that these machines now routinely string together 10 or 20 qubits and may soon hold sway over 100 or more.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":615444,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-504329","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/504329","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=504329"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/504329\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":504330,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/504329\/revisions\/504330"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/615444"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=504329"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=504329"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=504329"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}