{"id":509449,"date":"2018-08-16T03:30:57","date_gmt":"2018-08-16T07:30:57","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?guid=1fcc2e8ea20ec0aec0cbcf10efcebf93"},"modified":"2018-08-16T03:30:57","modified_gmt":"2018-08-16T07:30:57","slug":"educational-tracking-creates-artificial-inequalities-among-students","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=509449","title":{"rendered":"Educational tracking creates artificial inequalities among students"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>In a series of studies, social psychologists show that educational tracking\u2014grouping students based on their achievement levels\u2014encourages evaluators to artificially create social class inequalities. Three studies reveal that evaluators consider a lower track more suitable for a low socioeconomic status (SES) pupil and a higher track more suitable for a high-SES pupil, even when school achievement was identical. The results appear in the journal Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, published by the Society for Personality and Social Psychology.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In a series of studies, social psychologists show that educational tracking&mdash;grouping students based on their achievement levels&mdash;encourages evaluators to artificially create social class inequalities. Three studies reveal that evaluators consider a lower track more suitable for a low socioeconomic status (SES) pupil and a higher track more suitable for a high-SES pupil, even when school achievement was identical. The results appear in the journal Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, published by the Society for Personality and Social Psychology.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":615444,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-509449","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/509449","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=509449"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/509449\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":509450,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/509449\/revisions\/509450"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/615444"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=509449"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=509449"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=509449"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}