{"id":511899,"date":"2018-08-15T12:03:56","date_gmt":"2018-08-15T16:03:56","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ntrs.nasa.gov\/search.jsp?R=20180003524"},"modified":"2018-08-15T12:03:56","modified_gmt":"2018-08-15T16:03:56","slug":"comparison-of-performance-test-results-to-cfd-and-structural-models-of-non-contacting-finger-seals-stub","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=511899","title":{"rendered":"Comparison of Performance Test Results to CFD and Structural Models of Non-Contacting Finger Seals [STUB]"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Abstract: Performance tests of non-contacting finger seal designs were conducted at 300, 700, 922 K (70, 800 and 1200 F) at pressure differentials up to 517 kPa (75 psid) and surface speeds up to 366 m\/s (1200 ft\/s). Room temperature, static analysis of the seal was performed. A simplified CFD model was developed to examine pressure loads within the seal. Results from the CFD model were used as input to a finite element analysis model of a six-finger segment of the non-contacting finger seal. Examinati&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Abstract: Performance tests of non-contacting finger seal designs were conducted at 300, 700, 922 K (70, 800 and 1200 F) at pressure differentials up to 517 kPa (75 psid) and surface speeds up to 366 m\/s (1200 ft\/s). Room temperature, static analysis o&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":60,"featured_media":615444,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-511899","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/511899","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/60"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=511899"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/511899\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":513231,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/511899\/revisions\/513231"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/615444"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=511899"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=511899"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=511899"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}