{"id":518994,"date":"2018-09-09T09:34:01","date_gmt":"2018-09-09T13:34:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ntrs.nasa.gov\/search.jsp?R=20180004351"},"modified":"2018-09-09T09:34:01","modified_gmt":"2018-09-09T13:34:01","slug":"a-comparison-of-radio-frequency-interference-within-and-outside-of-allocated-passive-earth-exploration-bands-at-10-65-ghz-and-18-7-ghz-using-the-gpm-microwave-imager-and-windsat","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=518994","title":{"rendered":"A Comparison of Radio Frequency Interference Within and Outside of Allocated Passive Earth Exploration Bands at 10.65 Ghz and 18.7 Ghz Using the GPM Microwave Imager and Windsat"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Abstract: Radio Frequency Interference (RFI) for Microwave Imagers has been increasing over time for L-band, C-Band, X-Band, Ku-Band The GPM constellation of radiometers provides a unique dataset that we can use to survey the RFI environment RFI at 10 GHz has been increasing over the last 2 decades. -Wider bandwidths (like WindSat), outside of the 10.6 to 10.7 GHz allocated band, don&#8217;t provide substantial RFI rejection over land -The major advantage of remaining within the allocated band at 10.6 to 10&#8230;.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Abstract: Radio Frequency Interference (RFI) for Microwave Imagers has been increasing over time for L-band, C-Band, X-Band, Ku-Band The GPM constellation of radiometers provides a unique dataset that we can use to survey the RFI environment RFI at 10 &#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":60,"featured_media":615444,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-518994","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/518994","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/60"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=518994"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/518994\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":518995,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/518994\/revisions\/518995"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/615444"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=518994"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=518994"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=518994"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}