{"id":523173,"date":"2018-09-18T13:17:13","date_gmt":"2018-09-18T17:17:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.sciencedaily.com\/releases\/2018\/09\/180918131713.htm"},"modified":"2018-09-18T13:17:13","modified_gmt":"2018-09-18T17:17:13","slug":"geoscientists-find-unexpected-deep-creep-near-san-andreas-san-jacinto-faults-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=523173","title":{"rendered":"Geoscientists find unexpected &#8216;deep creep&#8217;  near San Andreas, San Jacinto faults"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A new analysis of thousands of very small earthquakes in the San Bernardino basin suggests that the unusual deformation of some may be due to &#8216;deep creep&#8217; 10 km below the Earth&#8217;s surface, say geoscientists. They say scientists should not use the information recorded by these small earthquakes to predict loading of the nearby San Andreas and San Jacinto faults. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A new analysis of thousands of very small earthquakes in the San Bernardino basin suggests that the unusual deformation of some may be due to &#8216;deep creep&#8217; 10 km below the Earth&#8217;s surface, say geoscientists. They say scientists should not use the inform&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":61,"featured_media":615444,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-523173","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/523173","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/61"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=523173"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/523173\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":523174,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/523173\/revisions\/523174"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/615444"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=523173"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=523173"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=523173"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}