{"id":529,"date":"2003-09-07T22:23:07","date_gmt":"2003-09-08T03:23:07","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2003-09-07T22:23:07","modified_gmt":"2003-09-08T03:23:07","slug":"nasa-opens-new-chapter-in-supersonic-flight","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=529","title":{"rendered":"NASA OPENS NEW CHAPTER IN SUPERSONIC FLIGHT"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>     Flight tests completed by NASA, with government and industry partners, may have demonstrated a way to reduce the window-rattling impact of sonic booms.<\/p>\n<p>In flights conducted Aug. 27 on the same test range where Chuck Yeager first broke the sound barrier nearly 56 years ago, the team showed modifying an aircraft&#8217;s shape can also change the shape of its sonic boom, thereby reducing loudness. This theory had never been demonstrated in actual flight.<br \/>\n<!--more--><br \/>\nThe Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency&#8217;s Shaped Sonic Boom Demonstration (SSBD) program is a $7 million cooperative agreement supported by NASA&#8217;s Langley Research Center (LaRC), Hampton, Va., NASA&#8217;s Dryden Flight Research Center, Edwards, Calif., and Northrop Grumman Corporation, El Segundo, Calif. The program has also received support from other government and industry organizations. <\/p>\n<p>&#8220;This demonstration is the culmination of 40 years of work by visionary engineers,&#8221; said Richard Wlezien, Program Manager for Vehicle Systems in NASA&#8217;s Office of Aerospace Technology, Washington. &#8220;They foresaw a way to solve the sonic boom problem, and to enable a generation of supersonic aircraft that do not disturb people on the ground. It is but one of many frontiers in aeronautics that remain to be explored,&#8221; he said.<\/p>\n<p>An aircraft traveling through the atmosphere continuously produces air-pressure waves similar to waves created by the bow of a ship. When the aircraft exceeds the speed of sound (approximately 750 mph at sea level), the pressure waves merge to form shock waves, which are heard as a sonic boom, when they reach the ground. The flight tests showed by designing the aircraft to a specific shape, the pressure waves can be kept from merging. When these weaker waves reach the ground, the loudness of the sonic boom is greatly reduced.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The team was confident the SSBD design would work, but field measurements of sonic booms are notoriously difficult,&#8221; said Peter Coen, Supersonic Vehicles Technology manager at LaRC. &#8220;We were all blown away by the clarity of what we measured.&#8221; <\/p>\n<p>For the demonstration, Northrop Grumman modified an F-5E fighter aircraft that was provided by the U.S. Navy&#8217;s Naval Air Systems Command. The company designed and installed a specially shaped &#8220;nose glove&#8221; and added aluminum substructure and a composite skin to the underside of the fuselage. <\/p>\n<p>During the experiment, the modified F-5E aircraft flew through a test range at Edwards Air Force Base, Calif., at supersonic speeds. NASA and industry sensors on the ground and in Dryden&#8217;s F-15B measured the shape and magnitude of the sonic boom. Shortly thereafter, an unmodified F-5E flew through the same airspace. Comparison of the data confirmed the modified shape of the test aircraft altered the sonic boom as expected. Repeated tests verified these results.<\/p>\n<p>For pictures of aircraft used in the tests on the Internet visit:<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.dfrc.nasa.gov\/Gallery\/Photo\/F-15B\/HTML\/EC03-0210-1.html\"   target=\"_blank\"  ><br \/>\nhttp:\/\/www.dfrc.nasa.gov\/Gallery\/Photo\/F-15B\/HTML\/EC03-0210-1.html  <\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.dfrc.nasa.gov\/Gallery\/Photo\/F-15B\/HTML\/EC03-0225-6.html\"   target=\"_blank\"  ><br \/>\nhttp:\/\/www.dfrc.nasa.gov\/Gallery\/Photo\/F-15B\/HTML\/EC03-0225-6.html  <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Flight tests completed by NASA, with government and industry partners, may have demonstrated a way to reduce the window-rattling impact of sonic booms. In flights conducted Aug. 27 on the&hellip; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":612598,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-529","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-NASA"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/529","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=529"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/529\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/612598"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=529"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=529"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=529"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}