{"id":539965,"date":"2018-10-26T10:27:15","date_gmt":"2018-10-26T14:27:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.sciencedaily.com\/releases\/2018\/10\/181026102715.htm"},"modified":"2018-10-26T10:27:15","modified_gmt":"2018-10-26T14:27:15","slug":"getting-the-most-out-of-atmospheric-data-analysis","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=539965","title":{"rendered":"Getting the most out of atmospheric data analysis"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>An international team has used a new approach to analyze an atmospheric data set spanning 18 years for the investigation of new-particle formation. They found that their method &#8212; based on mutual information &#8212; supported the major findings of previous work, whilst being more accurate and easier to carry out. The method is expected to provide a useful tool for analyzing other variables that influence atmospheric processes. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>An international team has used a new approach to analyze an atmospheric data set spanning 18 years for the investigation of new-particle formation. They found that their method &#8212; based on mutual information &#8212; supported the major findings of previous &#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":61,"featured_media":615444,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-539965","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/539965","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/61"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=539965"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/539965\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":539966,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/539965\/revisions\/539966"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/615444"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=539965"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=539965"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=539965"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}