{"id":544736,"date":"2018-11-05T06:57:19","date_gmt":"2018-11-05T10:57:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ntrs.nasa.gov\/search.jsp?R=20180006943"},"modified":"2018-11-05T06:57:19","modified_gmt":"2018-11-05T10:57:19","slug":"carbon-monoxide-levels-in-the-extravehicular-mobility-unit-by-modeling-and-operational-testing","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=544736","title":{"rendered":"Carbon Monoxide Levels in the Extravehicular Mobility Unit by Modeling and Operational Testing"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Abstract: Carbon monoxide (CO) is a toxic gas with potential for detriment to spaceflight operations. An analytical model was developed to investigate if a maximum CO contamination of 1 ppm in the oxygen (O2) supply risked crewmember health during extravehicular activity (EVA). Occupational monitoring pre- and post-suited exposures provided supplementary data for review.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Abstract: Carbon monoxide (CO) is a toxic gas with potential for detriment to spaceflight operations. An analytical model was developed to investigate if a maximum CO contamination of 1 ppm in the oxygen (O2) supply risked crewmember health during extr&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":60,"featured_media":615444,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-544736","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/544736","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/60"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=544736"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/544736\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":544737,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/544736\/revisions\/544737"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/615444"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=544736"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=544736"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=544736"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}