{"id":546618,"date":"2018-11-14T10:12:27","date_gmt":"2018-11-14T14:12:27","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?guid=7b6a265c5c4f337d80818095c43e0fd9"},"modified":"2018-11-14T10:12:27","modified_gmt":"2018-11-14T14:12:27","slug":"pressure-helps-to-make-better-li-ion-batteries","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=546618","title":{"rendered":"Pressure helps to make better Li-ion batteries"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Lithium titanium oxide (Li4Ti5O12, LTO), a &#8220;zero-strain&#8221; anode material for Li-ion batteries (LIBs), exhibits excellent cycling performance. However, it shows poor conductivity, which is the major drawback and limits its applications. In a recent paper published in National Science Review, it is reported that static compression can highly improve the conductivity of LTO by pressure-induced amorphization and promoting ion migration defects for Li+. The results suggest amorphous LTO is a better anode material for LIBs.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Lithium titanium oxide (Li4Ti5O12, LTO), a &#8220;zero-strain&#8221; anode material for Li-ion batteries (LIBs), exhibits excellent cycling performance. However, it shows poor conductivity, which is the major drawback and limits its applications. In a recent paper&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":615444,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-546618","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/546618","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=546618"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/546618\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":546619,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/546618\/revisions\/546619"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/615444"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=546618"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=546618"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=546618"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}