{"id":557792,"date":"2018-12-17T09:18:17","date_gmt":"2018-12-17T13:18:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.sciencedaily.com\/releases\/2018\/12\/181217081817.htm"},"modified":"2018-12-17T09:18:17","modified_gmt":"2018-12-17T13:18:17","slug":"boston-harbor-cleanup-was-economically-justifiable-finds-new-study-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=557792","title":{"rendered":"Boston Harbor cleanup was economically justifiable, finds new study"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A first-of-its-kind retrospective study finds that environmental cleanup projects are economically viable. The economic evaluation analysis estimates that Boston Harbor &#8212; once dubbed America&#8217;s filthiest harbor &#8212; is now worth between $30 and $100 billion in ecosystem services. The study demonstrates that the post-cleanup value of healthy ecosystems and their associated benefits to society should be considered when evaluating options for coastal areas. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A first-of-its-kind retrospective study finds that environmental cleanup projects are economically viable. The economic evaluation analysis estimates that Boston Harbor &#8212; once dubbed America&#8217;s filthiest harbor &#8212; is now worth between $30 and $100 bill&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":61,"featured_media":615444,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-557792","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/557792","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/61"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=557792"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/557792\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":557793,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/557792\/revisions\/557793"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/615444"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=557792"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=557792"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=557792"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}