{"id":559436,"date":"2018-12-19T10:50:02","date_gmt":"2018-12-19T14:50:02","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?guid=37cfee131d25eb09e4407b27aba20d5b"},"modified":"2018-12-19T10:50:02","modified_gmt":"2018-12-19T14:50:02","slug":"uranium-lead-dating-shows-that-the-cambrian-explosion-is-younger-than-previously-thought","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=559436","title":{"rendered":"Uranium-lead dating shows that the Cambrian explosion is younger than previously thought"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Using uranium-lead dating, Senckenberg scientists, in cooperation with an international team, were able to date the onset of the &#8220;Cambrian explosion&#8221; to precisely 538.8 million years ago. During the &#8220;Cambrian explosion,&#8221; all currently known &#8220;blueprints&#8221; in the animal kingdom appeared within a few million years, while at the same time the so-called &#8220;Ediacara biota&#8221; \u2013 a group of unique, specialized life forms \u2013 became extinct. The study was recently published in the scientific journal Terra Nova.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Using uranium-lead dating, Senckenberg scientists, in cooperation with an international team, were able to date the onset of the &#8220;Cambrian explosion&#8221; to precisely 538.8 million years ago. During the &#8220;Cambrian explosion,&#8221; all currently known &#8220;blueprints&#8221; in the animal kingdom appeared within a few million years, while at the same time the so-called &#8220;Ediacara biota&#8221; &ndash; a group of unique, specialized life forms &ndash; became extinct. The study was recently published in the scientific journal Terra Nova.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":615444,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-559436","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/559436","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=559436"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/559436\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":559437,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/559436\/revisions\/559437"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/615444"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=559436"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=559436"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=559436"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}