{"id":564618,"date":"2019-01-07T16:00:07","date_gmt":"2019-01-07T20:00:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?guid=3c43aa58393dff076102b4585e65b9f1"},"modified":"2019-01-07T16:00:07","modified_gmt":"2019-01-07T20:00:07","slug":"evolution-used-same-genetic-formula-to-turn-animals-monogamous-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=564618","title":{"rendered":"Evolution used same genetic formula to turn animals monogamous"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Why are some animals committed to their mates and others are not? According to a new study led by researchers at The University of Texas at Austin that looked at 10 species of vertebrates, evolution used a kind of universal formula for turning non-monogamous species into monogamous species\u2014turning up the activity of some genes and turning down others in the brain.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Why are some animals committed to their mates and others are not? According to a new study led by researchers at The University of Texas at Austin that looked at 10 species of vertebrates, evolution used a kind of universal formula for turning non-monogamous species into monogamous species&mdash;turning up the activity of some genes and turning down others in the brain.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":615444,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-564618","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/564618","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=564618"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/564618\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":564619,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/564618\/revisions\/564619"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/615444"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=564618"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=564618"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=564618"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}