{"id":565735,"date":"2019-01-09T10:10:17","date_gmt":"2019-01-09T14:10:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.sciencedaily.com\/releases\/2019\/01\/190109091017.htm"},"modified":"2019-01-09T10:10:17","modified_gmt":"2019-01-09T14:10:17","slug":"environmentally-friendly-flame-retardant-could-degrade-into-less-safe-compounds-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=565735","title":{"rendered":"&#8216;Environmentally friendly&#8217; flame retardant could degrade into less safe compounds"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>To reduce the risk of fire, many everyday products &#8212; from building materials to furniture to clothing &#8212; contain flame retardants. In recent years, some of these compounds were shown to have harmful effects on the environment, causing them to be replaced by more eco-friendly alternatives. However, a new study indicates that heat or ultraviolet light could break down a &#8216;safe&#8217; flame retardant into potentially harmful compounds. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>To reduce the risk of fire, many everyday products &#8212; from building materials to furniture to clothing &#8212; contain flame retardants. In recent years, some of these compounds were shown to have harmful effects on the environment, causing them to be repla&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":61,"featured_media":615444,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-565735","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/565735","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/61"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=565735"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/565735\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":565736,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/565735\/revisions\/565736"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/615444"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=565735"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=565735"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=565735"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}