{"id":572391,"date":"2019-01-28T00:08:32","date_gmt":"2019-01-28T04:08:32","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.sciencedaily.com\/releases\/2019\/01\/190127230832.htm"},"modified":"2019-01-28T00:08:32","modified_gmt":"2019-01-28T04:08:32","slug":"bug-bombs-are-ineffective-killing-roaches-indoors","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=572391","title":{"rendered":"&#8216;Bug bombs&#8217; are ineffective killing roaches indoors"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Total release foggers, commonly known as &#8216;bug bombs,&#8217; are ineffective at removing cockroaches from indoor environments, according to a new study. Bug-bomb chemicals fail to reach places where cockroaches congregate the most &#8212; on the underside of surfaces and inside cabinets, researchers say. Besides leaving behind numerous cockroaches, bug bombs also leave behind nasty toxic residue in the middle of floors and countertops. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Total release foggers, commonly known as &#8216;bug bombs,&#8217; are ineffective at removing cockroaches from indoor environments, according to a new study. Bug-bomb chemicals fail to reach places where cockroaches congregate the most &#8212; on the underside of surfa&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":61,"featured_media":615444,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-572391","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/572391","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/61"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=572391"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/572391\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":572392,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/572391\/revisions\/572392"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/615444"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=572391"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=572391"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=572391"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}