{"id":573023,"date":"2019-01-28T18:45:40","date_gmt":"2019-01-28T22:45:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.sciencedaily.com\/releases\/2019\/01\/190128174540.htm"},"modified":"2019-01-28T18:45:40","modified_gmt":"2019-01-28T22:45:40","slug":"common-test-for-mental-health-understanding-is-biased-study-finds","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=573023","title":{"rendered":"Common test for mental health understanding is biased, study finds"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The National Institute for Mental Health recommends a test, called the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Task (RMET), for assessing a person&#8217;s mental health understanding &#8212; that is a patient&#8217;s ability to understanding what other people are thinking and feeling. But there&#8217;s a problem. Using data from more than 40,000 people, a new study concludes that the test is deeply flawed. It relies too heavily on a person&#8217;s vocabulary, intelligence, and culturally-biased stimuli. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The National Institute for Mental Health recommends a test, called the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Task (RMET), for assessing a person&#8217;s mental health understanding &#8212; that is a patient&#8217;s ability to understanding what other people are thinking and fee&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":61,"featured_media":615444,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-573023","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/573023","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/61"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=573023"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/573023\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":573024,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/573023\/revisions\/573024"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/615444"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=573023"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=573023"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=573023"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}