{"id":579095,"date":"2019-02-13T14:00:04","date_gmt":"2019-02-13T18:00:04","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?guid=038a29798e68bd8ec3adcda45f3ca720"},"modified":"2019-02-13T14:00:04","modified_gmt":"2019-02-13T18:00:04","slug":"bigger-teams-arent-always-better-in-science-and-tech","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=579095","title":{"rendered":"Bigger teams aren&#8217;t always better in science and tech"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>In today&#8217;s science and business worlds, it&#8217;s increasingly common to hear that solving big problems requires a big team. But a new analysis of more than 65 million papers, patents and software projects found that smaller teams produce much more disruptive and innovative research.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In today&#8217;s science and business worlds, it&#8217;s increasingly common to hear that solving big problems requires a big team. But a new analysis of more than 65 million papers, patents and software projects found that smaller teams produce much more disrupti&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":615444,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-579095","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/579095","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=579095"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/579095\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":579096,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/579095\/revisions\/579096"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/615444"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=579095"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=579095"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=579095"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}