{"id":583414,"date":"2019-02-22T13:52:23","date_gmt":"2019-02-22T17:52:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.sciencedaily.com\/releases\/2019\/02\/190222125223.htm"},"modified":"2019-02-22T13:52:23","modified_gmt":"2019-02-22T17:52:23","slug":"older-biologic-age-linked-to-elevated-breast-cancer-risk","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=583414","title":{"rendered":"Older biologic age linked to elevated breast cancer risk"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Biologic age, a DNA-based estimate of a person&#8217;s age, is associated with future development of breast cancer, according to scientists. Biologic age was determined by measuring DNA methylation, a chemical modification to DNA that is part of the normal aging process. For every five years a woman&#8217;s biologic age was older than her chronologic or actual age, she had a 15 percent increased risk of developing breast cancer. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Biologic age, a DNA-based estimate of a person&#8217;s age, is associated with future development of breast cancer, according to scientists. Biologic age was determined by measuring DNA methylation, a chemical modification to DNA that is part of the normal a&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":61,"featured_media":615444,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-583414","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/583414","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/61"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=583414"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/583414\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":583415,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/583414\/revisions\/583415"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/615444"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=583414"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=583414"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=583414"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}