{"id":593356,"date":"2019-03-18T11:15:56","date_gmt":"2019-03-18T15:15:56","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?guid=8358ad7a0d3fa21c05a704b33bfd0cf4"},"modified":"2019-03-18T11:15:56","modified_gmt":"2019-03-18T15:15:56","slug":"seafood-mislabeling-rate-less-than-1-percent-for-products-with-msc-ecolabel-vs-global-average-of-30-percent","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=593356","title":{"rendered":"Seafood mislabeling rate less than 1 percent for products with MSC ecolabel vs. global average of 30 percent"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>DNA barcoding of more than 1400 Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) labelled products has shown that less than 1% were mislabelled, compared with a reported average global seafood mislabelling rate of 30 percent. These results published in the journal Current Biology suggests that the MSC&#8217;s ecolabelling and Chain of Custody program is an effective deterrent for systematic and deliberate species substitution and fraud.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>DNA barcoding of more than 1400 Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) labelled products has shown that less than 1% were mislabelled, compared with a reported average global seafood mislabelling rate of 30 percent. These results published in the journal Cur&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":615444,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-593356","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/593356","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=593356"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/593356\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":593357,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/593356\/revisions\/593357"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/615444"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=593356"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=593356"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=593356"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}