{"id":594197,"date":"2019-03-19T13:00:01","date_gmt":"2019-03-19T17:00:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?guid=0caec6bb5cdf414dec3736937ef38849"},"modified":"2019-03-19T13:00:01","modified_gmt":"2019-03-19T17:00:01","slug":"the-rise-and-fall-of-ziggy-star-formation-and-the-rich-dust-from-ancient-stars-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=594197","title":{"rendered":"The rise and fall of Ziggy star formation and the rich dust from ancient stars"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Researchers have detected a radio signal from abundant interstellar dust in MACS0416_Y1, a galaxy 13.2 billion light-years away in the constellation Eridanus. Standard models can&#8217;t explain this much dust in a galaxy this young, forcing us to rethink the history of star formation. Researchers now think MACS0416_Y1 experienced staggered star formation with two intense starburst periods 300 million and 600 million years after the Big Bang with a quiet phase in between.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Researchers have detected a radio signal from abundant interstellar dust in MACS0416_Y1, a galaxy 13.2 billion light-years away in the constellation Eridanus. Standard models can&#8217;t explain this much dust in a galaxy this young, forcing us to rethink th&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":615444,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-594197","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/594197","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=594197"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/594197\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":594198,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/594197\/revisions\/594198"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/615444"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=594197"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=594197"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=594197"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}