{"id":608211,"date":"2019-04-16T07:09:17","date_gmt":"2019-04-16T11:09:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ntrs.nasa.gov\/search.jsp?R=20190002443"},"modified":"2019-04-16T07:09:17","modified_gmt":"2019-04-16T11:09:17","slug":"magnetically-advected-winds","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=608211","title":{"rendered":"Magnetically Advected Winds"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Abstract: Observations of X-ray absorption lines in magnetically driven disc winds around black hole binaries and active galactic nuclei yield a universal radial density profile ? ? r(sup -1.2) in the wind. This is in disagreement with the standard Blandford and Payne profile ?BP ? r(sup -1.5) expected when the magnetic field is neither advected nor diffusing through the accretion disc. In order to account for this discrepancy, we establish a new paradigm for magnetically driven astrophysical winds acc&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Abstract: Observations of X-ray absorption lines in magnetically driven disc winds around black hole binaries and active galactic nuclei yield a universal radial density profile ? ? r(sup -1.2) in the wind. This is in disagreement with the standard Bla&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":60,"featured_media":615444,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-608211","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/608211","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/60"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=608211"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/608211\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":608212,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/608211\/revisions\/608212"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/615444"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=608211"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=608211"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=608211"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}