{"id":610424,"date":"2019-04-23T11:40:33","date_gmt":"2019-04-23T15:40:33","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=610424"},"modified":"2019-04-23T11:40:33","modified_gmt":"2019-04-23T15:40:33","slug":"strongly-agree-the-number-of-response-options-matter-when-using-a-likert-scale-3","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=610424","title":{"rendered":"Strongly agree: The number of response options matter when using a Likert Scale"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Researchers often tweak the number of response options in the traditional five-point Likert Scale with little empirical justification for doing so. Now a psychologist has tested the test. Leonard Simms says &#8216;six appears to be the magic number&#8217; of responses.<\/p>\n<p> Click here for original story, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.sciencedaily.com\/releases\/2019\/04\/190423114033.htm\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\">Strongly agree: The number of response options matter when using a Likert Scale<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Source: ScienceDaily<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Researchers often tweak the number of response options in the traditional five-point Likert Scale with little empirical justification for doing so. Now a psychologist has tested the test. Leonard Simms&hellip; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":615444,"comment_status":"false","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[13],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-610424","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-genaero"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/610424","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=610424"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/610424\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/615444"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=610424"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=610424"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=610424"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}