{"id":612826,"date":"2019-04-29T11:56:55","date_gmt":"2019-04-29T15:56:55","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=612826"},"modified":"2019-04-29T11:56:55","modified_gmt":"2019-04-29T15:56:55","slug":"hubble-data-disparity-in-hubble-constant-calculations-is-not-a-fluke","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=612826","title":{"rendered":"Hubble Data:  Disparity in Hubble Constant Calculations Is Not A Fluke"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Hubble&#8217;s measurements of today&#8217;s expansion rate do not match the rate that was expected based on how the Universe appeared shortly after the Big Bang over 13 billion years ago.<\/p>\n<p>&#013;<br \/>\n&#013;<br \/>\n&#013;<br \/>\n Click here for original story, <a href=\"http:\/\/spaceref.com\/astronomy\/hubble-data-disparity-in-hubble-constant-calculations-is-not-a-fluke.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\">Hubble Data:  Disparity in Hubble Constant Calculations Is Not A Fluke<\/a>&#013;<br \/>\n&#013;<br \/>\n&#013;<br \/>\nSource: Astronomy&#013;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Hubble&#8217;s measurements of today&#8217;s expansion rate do not match the rate that was expected based on how the Universe appeared shortly after the Big Bang over 13 billion years ago.&hellip; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":615444,"comment_status":"false","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-612826","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-astronomy"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/612826","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=612826"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/612826\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/615444"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=612826"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=612826"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=612826"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}