{"id":613034,"date":"2019-04-29T15:00:09","date_gmt":"2019-04-29T19:00:09","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?guid=6dfbc845141f9d4f8a78f62357ddb06f"},"modified":"2019-04-29T15:00:09","modified_gmt":"2019-04-29T19:00:09","slug":"pedigree-is-not-destiny-when-it-comes-to-scholarly-success","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=613034","title":{"rendered":"&#8216;Pedigree is not destiny&#8217; when it comes to scholarly success"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>What matters more to a scientist&#8217;s career success: where they currently work, or where they got their Ph.D.? It&#8217;s a question a team of researchers teases apart in a new paper published in PNAS. Their analysis calls into question a common assumption underlying academia: that a researcher&#8217;s productivity reflects their scientific skill, which is reflected in the prestige of their doctoral training.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>What matters more to a scientist&#8217;s career success: where they currently work, or where they got their Ph.D.? It&#8217;s a question a team of researchers teases apart in a new paper published in PNAS. Their analysis calls into question a common assumption und&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3230,"featured_media":615444,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-613034","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/613034","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3230"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=613034"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/613034\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":613035,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/613034\/revisions\/613035"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/615444"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=613034"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=613034"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=613034"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}