{"id":615073,"date":"2019-05-03T08:51:25","date_gmt":"2019-05-03T12:51:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ntrs.nasa.gov\/search.jsp?R=20190004910"},"modified":"2019-05-03T08:51:25","modified_gmt":"2019-05-03T12:51:25","slug":"modeling-heatshield-erosion-due-to-dust-particle-impacts-for-a-martian-entry-vehicle","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=615073","title":{"rendered":"Modeling Heatshield Erosion Due to Dust Particle Impacts for a Martian Entry Vehicle"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Abstract: Because planetary missions to Mars take years from initial design to arrival at Mars, and because of the unpredictability of major global dust storms, the de-sign of the thermal protection system (TPS) of a Mars entry vehicle requires an estimation for the potential damage caused by dust particle impacts on the heat-shield. This paper will review previous analytical and experimental approaches to modeling dust particle ero-sion and will compare the legacy models against more modern computatio&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Abstract: Because planetary missions to Mars take years from initial design to arrival at Mars, and because of the unpredictability of major global dust storms, the de-sign of the thermal protection system (TPS) of a Mars entry vehicle requires an esti&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":60,"featured_media":615444,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-615073","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/615073","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/60"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=615073"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/615073\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":615074,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/615073\/revisions\/615074"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/615444"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=615073"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=615073"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=615073"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}