{"id":617664,"date":"2019-05-17T08:16:40","date_gmt":"2019-05-17T12:16:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=617664"},"modified":"2019-05-17T08:16:40","modified_gmt":"2019-05-17T12:16:40","slug":"scientists-propose-rethinking-endangered-species-definition-to-save-slow-breeding-giants-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=617664","title":{"rendered":"Scientists propose rethinking &#039;endangered species&#039; definition to save slow-breeding giants"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Conservation decisions based on population counts may fail to protect large, slow-breeding animals from irrevocable decline, according to new research.&#013;<br \/>\n&#013;<br \/>\n&#013;<br \/>\n Click here for original story, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.sciencedaily.com\/releases\/2019\/05\/190517081640.htm\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\">Scientists propose rethinking &#8216;endangered species&#8217; definition to save slow-breeding giants<\/a>&#013;<br \/>\n&#013;<br \/>\n&#013;<br \/>\nSource: ScienceDaily&#013;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Conservation decisions based on population counts may fail to protect large, slow-breeding animals from irrevocable decline, according to new research.&#013; &#013; &#013; Click here for original story, Scientists propose rethinking&hellip; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":615444,"comment_status":"false","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[13],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-617664","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-genaero"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/617664","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=617664"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/617664\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/615444"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=617664"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=617664"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=617664"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}