{"id":618075,"date":"2019-05-22T12:05:02","date_gmt":"2019-05-22T16:05:02","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=618075"},"modified":"2019-05-22T12:05:02","modified_gmt":"2019-05-22T16:05:02","slug":"qualcomm-shares-slide-after-us-antitrust-ruling","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=618075","title":{"rendered":"Qualcomm shares slide after US antitrust ruling"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Smartphone chip giant Qualcomm suffered a fresh blow in its antitrust battle after a US federal judge ruled that it &#8220;strangled competition&#8221; for years at the expense of consumers and device makers.&#013;<br \/>\n&#013;<br \/>\n&#013;<br \/>\n Click here for original story, <a href=\"https:\/\/phys.org\/news\/2019-05-qualcomm-antitrust.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\">Qualcomm shares slide after US antitrust ruling<\/a>&#013;<br \/>\n&#013;<br \/>\n&#013;<br \/>\nSource: Phys.org&#013;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Smartphone chip giant Qualcomm suffered a fresh blow in its antitrust battle after a US federal judge ruled that it &#8220;strangled competition&#8221; for years at the expense of consumers and&hellip; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":615444,"comment_status":"false","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[41],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-618075","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-phys-org"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/618075","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=618075"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/618075\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/615444"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=618075"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=618075"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=618075"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}