{"id":621769,"date":"2019-06-25T09:00:28","date_gmt":"2019-06-25T13:00:28","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=621769"},"modified":"2019-06-25T09:00:28","modified_gmt":"2019-06-25T13:00:28","slug":"competitive-rivalry-in-facebook-messaging-not-such-a-bad-thing","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=621769","title":{"rendered":"Competitive rivalry in Facebook messaging not such a bad thing"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Research at the University of York has shown that brands that &#8220;take on&#8221; their competitors in Facebook posts are more likely to get higher engagement rates.&#013;<br \/>\n&#013;<br \/>\n&#013;<br \/>\n Click here for original story, <a href=\"https:\/\/phys.org\/news\/2019-06-competitive-rivalry-facebook-messaging-bad.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\">Competitive rivalry in Facebook messaging not such a bad thing<\/a>&#013;<br \/>\n&#013;<br \/>\n&#013;<br \/>\nSource: Phys.org&#013;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Research at the University of York has shown that brands that &#8220;take on&#8221; their competitors in Facebook posts are more likely to get higher engagement rates.&#013; &#013; &#013; Click here&hellip; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":615444,"comment_status":"false","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[41],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-621769","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-phys-org"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/621769","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=621769"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/621769\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/615444"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=621769"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=621769"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=621769"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}