{"id":629893,"date":"2019-09-06T13:40:11","date_gmt":"2019-09-06T17:40:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=629893"},"modified":"2019-09-06T13:40:11","modified_gmt":"2019-09-06T17:40:11","slug":"sum-of-three-cubes-for-42-finally-solved-using-real-life-planetary-computer-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=629893","title":{"rendered":"Sum of three cubes for 42 finally solved &#8212; using real life planetary computer"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Hot on the heels of the ground-breaking &#8216;Sum-Of-Three-Cubes&#8217; solution for the number 33, mathematicians have solved the final piece of the famous 65-year-old math puzzle with an answer for the most elusive number of all &#8211; 42.&#013;<br \/>\n&#013;<br \/>\n&#013;<br \/>\n Click here for original story, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.sciencedaily.com\/releases\/2019\/09\/190906134011.htm\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\">Sum of three cubes for 42 finally solved &#8212; using real life planetary computer<\/a>&#013;<br \/>\n&#013;<br \/>\n&#013;<br \/>\nSource: ScienceDaily&#013;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Hot on the heels of the ground-breaking &#8216;Sum-Of-Three-Cubes&#8217; solution for the number 33, mathematicians have solved the final piece of the famous 65-year-old math puzzle with an answer for the&hellip; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":615444,"comment_status":"false","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[13],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-629893","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-genaero"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/629893","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=629893"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/629893\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/615444"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=629893"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=629893"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=629893"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}