{"id":633863,"date":"2019-10-10T16:15:43","date_gmt":"2019-10-10T20:15:43","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=633863"},"modified":"2019-10-10T16:15:43","modified_gmt":"2019-10-10T20:15:43","slug":"engineers-solve-50-year-old-puzzle-in-signal-processing","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=633863","title":{"rendered":"Engineers solve 50-year-old puzzle in signal processing"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Engineers have solved a 50-year-old puzzle in signal processing. They&#8217;ve formulated the &#8216;inverse chirp z-transform,&#8217; an algorithm related to one that&#8217;s running on your cell phone right now. It took some computing power and some math expertise to do it.&#013;<br \/>\n&#013;<br \/>\n&#013;<br \/>\n Click here for original story, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.sciencedaily.com\/releases\/2019\/10\/191010161543.htm\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\">Engineers solve 50-year-old puzzle in signal processing<\/a>&#013;<br \/>\n&#013;<br \/>\n&#013;<br \/>\nSource: ScienceDaily&#013;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Engineers have solved a 50-year-old puzzle in signal processing. They&#8217;ve formulated the &#8216;inverse chirp z-transform,&#8217; an algorithm related to one that&#8217;s running on your cell phone right now. It took&hellip; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":615444,"comment_status":"false","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[13],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-633863","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-genaero"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/633863","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=633863"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/633863\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/615444"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=633863"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=633863"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=633863"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}