{"id":638449,"date":"2019-11-22T09:54:08","date_gmt":"2019-11-22T13:54:08","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=638449"},"modified":"2019-11-22T09:54:08","modified_gmt":"2019-11-22T13:54:08","slug":"wrc-19-update-small-satellites-and-the-1240-1300-mhz-band","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=638449","title":{"rendered":"WRC-19 Update: Small Satellites and the 1240-1300 MHz band"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"ITU<\/a>In the final week meetings at WRC-19 have been running until 3am in the morning in an attempt to get the work completed.<\/p>\n

The RSGB have released their WRC-19 report covering small satellites and also the Amateur 1240-1300 MHz band.<\/p>\n

The report notes \u201cA lesson from the process indicates how difficult it may be in future to achieve any upgrade to other amateur allocations.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

Read the RSGB report at
\nhttps:\/\/rsgb.org\/main\/blog\/news\/gb2rs\/2019\/11\/20\/wrc-19-day-18-satellites-and-23cm\/<\/a><\/p>\n


\n
\n
\n Click here for original story, WRC-19 Update: Small Satellites and the 1240-1300 MHz band<\/a>
\n
\n
\nSource: Amsat UK <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

In the final week meetings at WRC-19 have been running until 3am in the morning in an attempt to get the work completed. The RSGB have released their WRC-19 report… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":615444,"comment_status":"false","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[15],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-638449","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-AMSAT"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/638449","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=638449"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/638449\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/615444"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=638449"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=638449"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=638449"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}