{"id":638666,"date":"2019-11-25T18:34:40","date_gmt":"2019-11-25T22:34:40","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=638666"},"modified":"2019-11-25T18:34:40","modified_gmt":"2019-11-25T22:34:40","slug":"jupiters-great-red-spot-isnt-dead-yet","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=638666","title":{"rendered":"Jupiter\u2019s Great Red Spot Isn\u2019t Dead Yet"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Pieces of the gas giant\u2019s greatest storm had seemed to be slipping away, but scientists say the underlying vortex is unchanged.&#013;<br \/>\n&#013;<br \/>\n&#013;<br \/>\n Click here for original story, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2019\/11\/25\/science\/jupiter-great-red-spot.html?emc=rss&amp;partner=rss\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\">Jupiter\u2019s Great Red Spot Isn\u2019t Dead Yet<\/a>&#013;<br \/>\n&#013;<br \/>\n&#013;<br \/>\nSource: New York Times Space &amp; Cosmos&#013;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Pieces of the gas giant\u2019s greatest storm had seemed to be slipping away, but scientists say the underlying vortex is unchanged.&#013; &#013; &#013; Click here for original story, Jupiter\u2019s Great&hellip; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":615444,"comment_status":"false","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[40],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-638666","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-new-york-times-space-cosmos"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/638666","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=638666"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/638666\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/615444"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=638666"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=638666"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=638666"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}