{"id":642493,"date":"2020-01-08T18:57:06","date_gmt":"2020-01-08T22:57:06","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=642493"},"modified":"2020-01-08T18:57:06","modified_gmt":"2020-01-08T22:57:06","slug":"beijings-draft-ham-radio-regulations-raise-concerns","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=642493","title":{"rendered":"Beijing\u2019s draft ham radio regulations raise concerns"},"content":{"rendered":"<div data-shortcode=\"caption\" id=\"attachment_33644\" style=\"width: 310px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><a href=\"https:\/\/ukamsat.files.wordpress.com\/2020\/01\/logo_of_ministry_of_industry_and_information_technology.png\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-33644\" data-attachment-id=\"33644\" data-permalink=\"https:\/\/amsat-uk.org\/2020\/01\/08\/beijing-draft-ham-radio-regs\/logo_of_ministry_of_industry_and_information_technology\/\" data-orig-file=\"https:\/\/ukamsat.files.wordpress.com\/2020\/01\/logo_of_ministry_of_industry_and_information_technology.png\" data-orig-size=\"500,375\" data-comments-opened=\"0\" data-image-meta=\"{&quot;aperture&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;credit&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;camera&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;created_timestamp&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;copyright&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;focal_length&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;iso&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;shutter_speed&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;orientation&quot;:&quot;0&quot;}\" data-image-title=\"Logo_of_Ministry_of_Industry_and_Information_Technology\" data-image-description=\"&lt;p&gt;Logo of Ministry of Industry and Information Technology&lt;\/p&gt;&#010;\" data-medium-file=\"https:\/\/ukamsat.files.wordpress.com\/2020\/01\/logo_of_ministry_of_industry_and_information_technology.png?w=300\" data-large-file=\"https:\/\/ukamsat.files.wordpress.com\/2020\/01\/logo_of_ministry_of_industry_and_information_technology.png?w=500\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-33644\" src=\"http:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/01\/logo_of_ministry_of_industry_and_information_technology.png\" alt=\"Ministry of Industry and Information Technology\" width=\"300\" height=\"225\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p id=\"caption-attachment-33644\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Ministry of Industry and Information Technology<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>ARRL <a href=\"http:\/\/www.arrl.org\/news\/china-telecoms-regulator-proposing-to-delete-some-current-amateur-allocations\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">reports<\/a> on Beijing\u2019s draft <a href=\"https:\/\/tinyurl.com\/Beijing-Amateur-2019-Draft\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"><strong>Measures for the Administration of Amateur Radio Stations<\/strong><\/a> which appear to threaten 136 kHz and most amateur bands above 146 MHz.<\/p>\n<p>ARRL say:<\/p>\n<p><em><strong>Lide Zhang, BI8CKU<\/strong>, told ARRL that the proposal would prohibit amateur operation on the 2200-meter band as well as on 146 \u2013 148 MHz, 1260 \u2013 1300 MHz, 3400 \u2013 3500 MHz, 5650 \u2013 5725 MHz, and all bands above 10 GHz.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>Radio communications engineer and Chinese Amateur Satellite Group (CAMSAT) CEO <strong>Alan Kung, BA1DU<\/strong>, told ARRL that government efforts to eliminate some amateur bands are nothing new, but proposals that have been aired for a while now are on the regulatory agency\u2019s schedule. Kung said he does not anticipate that all of the bands proposed will be taken away, but he conceded that the climate will \u201cundoubtedly\u201d become increasingly more dangerous for China\u2019s amateur radio community.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Read the full ARRL story at<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.arrl.org\/news\/china-telecoms-regulator-proposing-to-delete-some-current-amateur-allocations\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">http:\/\/www.arrl.org\/news\/china-telecoms-regulator-proposing-to-delete-some-current-amateur-allocations<\/a><\/p>\n<p>A translation of the draft proposal says:<\/p>\n<p><em>\u201cNote 1: Unless otherwise specified, 135.7-137.8kHz, 146-148MHz, 1240-1260MHz, 1260-1300MHz, 3400-3500MHz, 5650-5725MHz, 10-10.4 GHz, 79-81GHz, 122.25-123GHz, 136-141GHz, 241-248GHz frequency The band frequency shall not be used for amateur services in the territory of the People\u2019s Republic of China.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n<p>A translated version of the draft proposal is at <a href=\"https:\/\/tinyurl.com\/Beijing-Amateur-2019-Draft\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https:\/\/tinyurl.com\/Beijing-Amateur-2019-Draft<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Original text <a href=\"https:\/\/www.kechuang.org\/r\/305282\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https:\/\/www.kechuang.org\/r\/305282<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&#013;<br \/>\n&#013;<br \/>\n&#013;<br \/>\n Click here for original story, <a href=\"https:\/\/amsat-uk.org\/2020\/01\/08\/beijing-draft-ham-radio-regs\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\">Beijing\u2019s draft ham radio regulations raise concerns<\/a>&#013;<br \/>\n&#013;<br \/>\n&#013;<br \/>\nSource: Amsat UK&#013;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Ministry of Industry and Information Technology ARRL reports on Beijing\u2019s draft Measures for the Administration of Amateur Radio Stations which appear to threaten 136 kHz and most amateur bands above&hellip; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":615444,"comment_status":"false","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[15],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-642493","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-AMSAT"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/642493","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=642493"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/642493\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/615444"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=642493"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=642493"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=642493"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}