{"id":642950,"date":"2020-01-13T15:19:31","date_gmt":"2020-01-13T19:19:31","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=642950"},"modified":"2020-01-13T15:19:31","modified_gmt":"2020-01-13T19:19:31","slug":"humanitys-footprint-is-squashing-worlds-wildlife","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=642950","title":{"rendered":"Humanity&#039;s footprint is squashing world&#039;s wildlife"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Using the most comprehensive dataset on the &#8216;human footprint,&#8217; which maps the accumulated impact of human activities on the land&#8217;s surface, researchers found intense human pressures across the range of a staggering 20,529 terrestrial vertebrate species.&#013;<br \/>\n&#013;<br \/>\n&#013;<br \/>\n Click here for original story, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.sciencedaily.com\/releases\/2020\/01\/200113141931.htm\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\">Humanity&#8217;s footprint is squashing world&#8217;s wildlife<\/a>&#013;<br \/>\n&#013;<br \/>\n&#013;<br \/>\nSource: ScienceDaily&#013;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Using the most comprehensive dataset on the &#8216;human footprint,&#8217; which maps the accumulated impact of human activities on the land&#8217;s surface, researchers found intense human pressures across the range of&hellip; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":615444,"comment_status":"false","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[13],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-642950","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-genaero"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/642950","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=642950"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/642950\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/615444"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=642950"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=642950"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=642950"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}