{"id":647500,"date":"2020-02-26T08:56:38","date_gmt":"2020-02-26T12:56:38","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=647500"},"modified":"2020-02-26T08:56:38","modified_gmt":"2020-02-26T12:56:38","slug":"afrl-creates-safer-than-steel-synthetic-winch-cable-for-cargo-aircraft","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=647500","title":{"rendered":"AFRL creates safer-than-steel synthetic winch cable for cargo aircraft"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"190\" height=\"115\" src=\"http:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/02\/C-17-Globemaster-III-190x115.jpg\" class=\"attachment-thumbnail size-thumbnail wp-post-image\" alt=\"\" \/><\/p>\n<p>The C-17 Globemaster III aircraft fleet currently uses winch cables made of steel to pull pallets, vehicles and other items onto the aircraft from the ground via the aft ramp.<\/p>\n<p>The current steel cable experiences dangerous snapback upon breakage, which can injure personnel and damage aircraft. The synthetic cable eliminates that danger since it does not snap back if it were to fracture.<\/p>\n<p>The Air Force Research Laboratory\u2019s Advanced Power Technology Office is changing this material to one that is lighter and safer.<\/p>\n<p>APTO has successfully designed, developed and tested a synthetic winch cable for the aircraft. The new cable replaces existing cables while being 40% cheaper and significantly lighter.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.defencetalk.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/02\/winch-cable-for-cargo-aircraft.jpg\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/02\/winch-cable-for-cargo-aircraft-300x168.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"168\" class=\"alignleft size-medium wp-image-74279\" \/><\/a>Measuring 280 feet, the current steel cable weighs in at a hefty 80 pounds compared to the new synthetic cable\u2019s 14 pounds, equating to an 83% lighter cable. Removing excess weight results in less fuel consumption and improved mission capabilities.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIt\u2019s about creating a safer winch cable for the C-17,\u201d said Ed Clark of the APTO Office. \u201cSerious injury occurs when a steel cable breaks, eliminating those injuries is imperative.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe change from steel to a synthetic material is most noteworthy in the significant weight difference,\u201d said Senior Master Sgt. Jeff Witherly, C-17 evaluator loadmaster, Scott Air Force Base, Illinois. \u201cThe cable is simply easier to move, maneuver and manipulate around the cargo compartment. The fact that it does not retain energy when it breaks is a huge safety advantage as it will not whiplash if it were to fail.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>During the first quarter of 2020, six sets of cables will be installed on two aircraft at three different operational bases. The Air Mobility Command and the C-17 Program Office will evaluate them for approval as a suitable substitute.<\/p>\n<p>Samson Rope Company is working with the crew to design the system. They manufacture industry-specific synthetic rope that is engineered to meet various demands.<\/p>\n<p>Upon approval, the fleet will be upgraded with the new synthetic cables and will become an Air Force-approved, commercially available item that can be procured for all C-17 aircraft.<\/p>\n<p>&#013;<br \/>\n&#013;<br \/>\n&#013;<br \/>\n Click here for original story, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.defencetalk.com\/afrl-creates-safer-than-steel-synthetic-winch-cable-for-cargo-aircraft-74277\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\">AFRL creates safer-than-steel synthetic winch cable for cargo aircraft<\/a>&#013;<br \/>\n&#013;<br \/>\n&#013;<br \/>\nSource: Air Force News&#013;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The C-17 Globemaster III aircraft fleet currently uses winch cables made of steel to pull pallets, vehicles and other items onto the aircraft from the ground via the aft ramp.&hellip; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":647501,"comment_status":"false","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[28],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-647500","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-air-force-space-command"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/647500","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=647500"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/647500\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/647501"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=647500"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=647500"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=647500"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}