{"id":669262,"date":"2020-10-07T16:16:00","date_gmt":"2020-10-07T20:16:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=669262"},"modified":"2020-10-07T16:16:00","modified_gmt":"2020-10-07T20:16:00","slug":"solar-physicist-predicts-a-slightly-better-solar-cycle-25","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=669262","title":{"rendered":"Solar Physicist Predicts a Slightly Better Solar Cycle 25"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Solar physicist Leif Svalgaard of the W.W. Hansen Experimental Physics Laboratory at Stanford University <strong>has predicted<\/strong> a maximum sunspot number of 128 \u00b110, slightly better than Solar Cycle 24.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe overall average is 132 \u00b147 (median 124),\u201d he said. \u201cNone of these numbers are substantially different, so one could perhaps just go with the \u2018wisdom of the crowd.\u2019 All predictions that we consider hav&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>&#013;<br \/>\n&#013;<br \/>\n&#013;<br \/>\n Click here for original story, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.arrl.org\/news\/view\/solar-physicist-predicts-a-slightly-better-solar-cycle-25\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\">Solar Physicist Predicts a Slightly Better Solar Cycle 25<\/a>&#013;<br \/>\n&#013;<br \/>\n&#013;<br \/>\nSource: ARRL&#013;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Solar physicist Leif Svalgaard of the W.W. Hansen Experimental Physics Laboratory at Stanford University has predicted a maximum sunspot number of 128 \u00b110, slightly better than Solar Cycle 24. \u201cThe&hellip; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":615444,"comment_status":"false","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-669262","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-ARRL"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/669262","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=669262"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/669262\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/615444"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=669262"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=669262"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=669262"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}