{"id":677144,"date":"2020-12-30T22:28:00","date_gmt":"2020-12-31T02:28:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=677144"},"modified":"2020-12-30T22:28:00","modified_gmt":"2020-12-31T02:28:00","slug":"fcc-reduces-proposed-amateur-radio-application-fee-to-35","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=677144","title":{"rendered":"FCC Reduces Proposed Amateur Radio Application Fee to $35"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The FCC has agreed with ARRL and other commenters that its proposed $50 fee for certain amateur radio applications was \u201ctoo high to account for the minimal staff involvement in these applications.\u201d In a <i>Report and Order<\/i> (<strong><i>R&amp;O<\/i><\/strong>), released on December 29, the FCC scaled back to $35 the fee for a new license application, a special temporary authority (STA) request, a rule waiver request, a license r&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>&#013;<br \/>\n&#013;<br \/>\n&#013;<br \/>\n Click here for original story, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.arrl.org\/news\/view\/fcc-reduces-proposed-amateur-radio-application-fee-to-35\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\">FCC Reduces Proposed Amateur Radio Application Fee to <\/a>&#013;<br \/>\n&#013;<br \/>\n&#013;<br \/>\nSource: ARRL&#013;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The FCC has agreed with ARRL and other commenters that its proposed $50 fee for certain amateur radio applications was \u201ctoo high to account for the minimal staff involvement in&hellip; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":615444,"comment_status":"false","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-677144","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-ARRL"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/677144","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=677144"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/677144\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/615444"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=677144"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=677144"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=677144"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}