{"id":677153,"date":"2020-12-31T12:09:00","date_gmt":"2020-12-31T16:09:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=677153"},"modified":"2020-12-31T12:09:00","modified_gmt":"2020-12-31T16:09:00","slug":"wsjt-x-2-4-0-introduces-new-digital-protocol-q65","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=677153","title":{"rendered":"WSJT-X 2.4.0 Introduces New Digital Protocol Q65"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><i>WSJT-X<\/i> version 2.4.0 has introduced a new digital protocol called Q65, which is designed for \u201cminimal two-way QSOs over especially difficult propagation paths,\u201d the <strong><i><span>Quick Start Guide<\/span><\/i><\/strong> says.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cOn paths with Doppler spread more than a few hertz, the weak-signal performance of Q65 is the best among all <i>WSJT-X<\/i> modes. Q65 is particularly effective for tropospheric scatter, ionospheric scatter, and EME &#8230;<\/p>\n<p>&#013;<br \/>\n&#013;<br \/>\n&#013;<br \/>\n Click here for original story, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.arrl.org\/news\/view\/wsjt-x-2-4-0-introduces-new-digital-protocol-q65\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\">WSJT-X 2.4.0 Introduces New Digital Protocol Q65<\/a>&#013;<br \/>\n&#013;<br \/>\n&#013;<br \/>\nSource: ARRL&#013;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>WSJT-X version 2.4.0 has introduced a new digital protocol called Q65, which is designed for \u201cminimal two-way QSOs over especially difficult propagation paths,\u201d the Quick Start Guide says. \u201cOn paths&hellip; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":615444,"comment_status":"false","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-677153","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-ARRL"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/677153","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=677153"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/677153\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/615444"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=677153"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=677153"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=677153"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}