{"id":693117,"date":"2021-06-14T11:11:45","date_gmt":"2021-06-14T15:11:45","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=693117"},"modified":"2021-06-14T11:11:45","modified_gmt":"2021-06-14T15:11:45","slug":"the-suns-clock-new-calculations-support-and-expand-planetary-hypothesis","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=693117","title":{"rendered":"The sun&#039;s clock: New calculations support and expand planetary hypothesis"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Solar physicists around the world have long been searching for satisfactory explanations for the sun&#8217;s many cyclical, overlapping activity fluctuations. In addition to the most famous, approximately 11-year &#8220;Schwabe cycle&#8221;, the sun also exhibits longer fluctuations, ranging from hundreds to thousands of years. It follows, for example, the &#8220;Gleissberg cycle&#8221; (about 85 years), the &#8220;Suess-de Vries cycle&#8221; (about 200 years) and the quasi-cycle of &#8220;Bond events&#8221; (about 1500 years), each named after their discoverers. It is undisputed that the solar magnetic field controls these activity fluctuations.&#013;<br \/>\n&#013;<br \/>\n&#013;<br \/>\n Click here for original story, <a href=\"https:\/\/phys.org\/news\/2021-06-sun-clock-planetary-hypothesis.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\">The sun&#8217;s clock: New calculations support and expand planetary hypothesis<\/a>&#013;<br \/>\n&#013;<br \/>\n&#013;<br \/>\nSource: Phys.org&#013;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Solar physicists around the world have long been searching for satisfactory explanations for the sun&#8217;s many cyclical, overlapping activity fluctuations. In addition to the most famous, approximately 11-year &#8220;Schwabe cycle&#8221;,&hellip; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":615444,"comment_status":"false","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[41],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-693117","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-phys-org"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/693117","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=693117"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/693117\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/615444"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=693117"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=693117"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=693117"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}