{"id":716089,"date":"2022-02-09T19:06:18","date_gmt":"2022-02-09T23:06:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=716089"},"modified":"2022-02-09T19:06:18","modified_gmt":"2022-02-09T23:06:18","slug":"geomagnetic-storm-destroys-40-new-spacex-satellites-in-orbit","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=716089","title":{"rendered":"Geomagnetic Storm Destroys 40 New SpaceX Satellites in Orbit"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The geomagnetic incident resulted in the Starlink transmitters drifting back into Earth\u2019s atmosphere, where they will burn up, potentially costing the company about $100 million.&#013;<br \/>\n&#013;<br \/>\n&#013;<br \/>\n Click here for original story, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2022\/02\/09\/science\/spacex-satellites-storm.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\">Geomagnetic Storm Destroys 40 New SpaceX Satellites in Orbit<\/a>&#013;<br \/>\n&#013;<br \/>\n&#013;<br \/>\nSource: New York Times Space &amp; Cosmos&#013;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The geomagnetic incident resulted in the Starlink transmitters drifting back into Earth\u2019s atmosphere, where they will burn up, potentially costing the company about $100 million.&#013; &#013; &#013; Click here for&hellip; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":615444,"comment_status":"false","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[40],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-716089","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-new-york-times-space-cosmos"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/716089","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=716089"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/716089\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/615444"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=716089"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=716089"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=716089"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}