{"id":765291,"date":"2023-09-09T15:40:15","date_gmt":"2023-09-09T19:40:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=765291"},"modified":"2023-09-09T15:40:15","modified_gmt":"2023-09-09T19:40:15","slug":"morocco-quake-not-in-most-active-area-but-expect-aftershocks-expert","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=765291","title":{"rendered":"Morocco quake not in most active area but expect aftershocks: expert"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The powerful earthquake that struck Morocco, killing more than a thousand people, didn&#8217;t hit in the most active seismological region, said one French expert. But aftershocks can be expected, he warned.&#013;<br \/>\n&#013;<br \/>\n&#013;<br \/>\n Click here for original story, <a href=\"https:\/\/phys.org\/news\/2023-09-morocco-quake-area-aftershocks-expert.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">Morocco quake not in most active area but expect aftershocks: expert<\/a>&#013;<br \/>\n&#013;<br \/>\n&#013;<br \/>\nSource: Phys.org&#013;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The powerful earthquake that struck Morocco, killing more than a thousand people, didn&#8217;t hit in the most active seismological region, said one French expert. But aftershocks can be expected, he&hellip; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":615444,"comment_status":"false","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[41],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-765291","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-phys-org"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/765291","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=765291"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/765291\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/615444"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=765291"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=765291"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=765291"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}