{"id":767034,"date":"2023-09-27T19:13:26","date_gmt":"2023-09-27T23:13:26","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=767034"},"modified":"2023-09-27T19:13:26","modified_gmt":"2023-09-27T23:13:26","slug":"nasa-led-study-pinpoints-areas-of-new-york-city-sinking-rising","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=767034","title":{"rendered":"NASA-Led Study Pinpoints Areas of New York City Sinking, Rising"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n
\n
\"The<\/figure>
\n
The land beneath the New York City area, including the borough of Queens, pictured here, is moving by fractions of inches each year. The motions are a legacy of the ice age and also due to human land usage.\n<\/div>\n
NASA\/JPL-Caltech<\/div>\n<\/figcaption><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

Scientists using space-based radar found that land in New York City is sinking at varying rates from human and natural factors. A few spots are rising.<\/p>\n

Parts of the New York City metropolitan area are sinking and rising at different rates due to factors ranging from land-use practices to long-lost glaciers, scientists have found. While the elevation changes seem small \u2013 fractions of inches per year \u2013 they can enhance or diminish local flood risk linked to sea level rise.<\/p>\n

The new study was published Wednesday in\u00a0Science Advances<\/a>\u00a0by a team of researchers from NASA\u2019s Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Southern California and Rutgers University in New Jersey. The team analyzed upward and downward\u00a0vertical land motion<\/a>\u00a0\u2013 also known as uplift and subsidence \u2013 across the metropolitan area from 2016 to 2023 using a remote sensing technique called interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR). The technique combines two or more 3D observations of the same region to reveal surface motion or topography.<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
\"\"<\/figure>
\n
Mapping vertical land motion across the New York City area, researchers found the land sinking (indicated in blue) by about 0.06 inches (1.6 millimeters) per year on average. They also detected modest uplift (shown in red) in Queens and Brooklyn. White dotted lines indicate county\/borough borders. <\/div>\n
NASA\/JPL-Caltech\/Rutgers University<\/div>\n<\/figcaption><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

Much of the motion they observed occurred in areas where prior modifications to Earth\u2019s surface \u2013 such as land reclamation and the construction of landfills \u2013 made the ground looser and more compressible beneath subsequent buildings.<\/p>\n

Some of the motion is also caused by natural processes dating back thousands of years to the most recent ice age. About 24,000 years ago, a huge ice sheet spread across most of New England, and a wall of ice more than a mile high covered what is today Albany in upstate New York. Earth\u2019s mantle, somewhat like a flexed mattress, has been slowly readjusting ever since. New York City, which sits on land that was raised just outside the edge of the ice sheet, is now sinking back down.<\/p>\n

The scientists found that on average the metropolitan area subsided by about 0.06 inches (1.6 millimeters) per year \u2013 about the same amount that a toenail grows in a month. Using the radars on the ESA (European Space Agency) Sentinel-1 satellites, along with advanced data processing techniques, they mapped the motion in detail and pinpointed neighborhoods and landmarks \u2013 down to an airport runway and tennis stadium \u2013 that are subsiding more rapidly than the average.<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
\"\"<\/figure>
\n
The team pinpointed hot spots: left, runway 13\/31 at LaGuardia Airport in Queens, is subsiding at a rate of about 0.15 inches (3.7 millimeters) per year; right, part of Newtown Creek, a Superfund site in East Williamsburg, Brooklyn, is rising unevenly by about 0.06 inches (1.6 millimeters) per year.<\/div>\n
NASA\/JPL-Caltech\/Rutgers University<\/div>\n<\/figcaption><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\u201cWe\u2019ve produced such a detailed map of vertical land motion in the New York City area that there are features popping out that haven\u2019t been noticed before,\u201d said lead author Brett Buzzanga, a postdoctoral researcher at JPL.<\/p>\n

David Bekaert, a JPL scientist and lead investigator of the project, said that tracking local elevation changes and\u00a0relative sea level<\/a>\u00a0can be important for flood mapping and planning purposes. This is especially critical as Earth\u2019s changing climate pushes oceans higher around the world, leading to more frequent\u00a0nuisance flood<\/a>\u00a0events and exacerbating destructive storm surges.<\/p>\n

Local Changes<\/h3>\n

The team identified two notable hot spots of subsidence co-located with landfills in Queens. One, runway 13\/31 at LaGuardia Airport, is subsiding at a rate of about 0.15 inches (3.7 millimeters) per year. The scientists noted that the airport is undergoing an $8 billion renovation designed in part to alleviate flooding from the rising waters of the Atlantic Ocean. They also identified Arthur Ashe Stadium, which is sinking at a rate of about 0.18 inches (4.6 millimeters) per year and required construction of a lightweight roof during renovation to reduce its heaviness and amount of subsidence.<\/p>\n

Other subsidence hot spots include the southern portion of Governors Island \u2013 built on 38 million square feet (3.5 million cubic meters) of rocks and dirt from early 20th century subway excavations \u2013 as well as sites near the ocean in Brooklyn\u2019s Coney Island and Arverne by the Sea in Queens that were built on artificial fill. Similar levels of subsidence were observed beneath Route 440 and Interstate 78 in suburban New Jersey, which traverse historic fill locations, and in Rikers Island, expanded to its present size by landfilling.<\/p>\n

The scientists also found previously unidentified uplift in East Williamsburg, Brooklyn \u2013 rising by about 0.06 inches (1.6 millimeters) per year \u2013 and in Woodside, Queens, which rose 0.27 inches (6.9 millimeters) per year between 2016 and 2019 before stabilizing. Co-author Robert Kopp of Rutgers University said that groundwater pumping and injection wells used to treat polluted water may have played a role, but further investigation is needed. \u201cI\u2019m intrigued by the potential of using high-resolution InSAR to measure these kinds of relatively short-lived environmental modifications associated with uplift,\u201d Kopp said.<\/p>\n

The scientists said that cities like New York, which are investing in coastal defenses and infrastructure in the face of sea level rise, can benefit from high-resolution estimates of land motion.<\/p>\n

The JPL-led\u00a0OPERA<\/a>\u00a0(Observational Products for End-Users from Remote Sensing Analysis) project will detail surface displacement across North America in a future data product. To do that, it will leverage InSAR data from ESA\u2019s Sentinel-1 and from the upcoming\u00a0NISAR<\/a>\u00a0(NASA-Indian Space Research Organization Synthetic Aperture Radar) mission, set to launch in 2024. Information from OPERA will help scientists better monitor vertical land motion along with other changes connected to natural hazards.<\/p>\n

Jane J. Lee \/ Andrew Wang<\/strong>
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif.
818-354-0307 \/ 626-379-6874
jane.j.lee@jpl.nasa.gov<\/a>\u00a0\/\u00a0andrew.wang@jpl.nasa.gov<\/a><\/p>\n

Written by Sally Younger<\/p>\n

2023-137<\/p>\n


\n
\n
\n Click here for original story, NASA-Led Study Pinpoints Areas of New York City Sinking, Rising<\/a>
\n
\n
\nSource: NASA Breaking News <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The land beneath the New York City area, including the borough of Queens, pictured here, is moving by fractions of inches each year. The motions are a legacy of the… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":767035,"comment_status":"false","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-767034","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-NASA"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/767034","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=767034"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/767034\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/767035"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=767034"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=767034"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=767034"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}