{"id":771873,"date":"2023-11-10T13:19:52","date_gmt":"2023-11-10T17:19:52","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=771873"},"modified":"2023-11-10T13:19:52","modified_gmt":"2023-11-10T17:19:52","slug":"the-k7ra-solar-update-4","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=771873","title":{"rendered":"The K7RA Solar Update"},"content":{"rendered":"<p> <br \/>\n<\/p>\n<div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<span class=\"date\">10\/20\/2023<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Sunspot activity dropped dramatically this week, with only two new<br \/>sunspot groups emerging, on October 14 and 16.<\/p>\n<p>Compared to last week, the average daily sunspot number slipped from<br \/>144.1 to 89.4, and average daily solar flux from 159.1 to 145.1.<\/p>\n<p>Average daily planetary A index changed from 7.6 to 6.4, and average<br \/>daily middle latitude A index from 8.3 to 5.<\/p>\n<p>Predicted solar flux is 128 and 130 October 20-21, 132 on October<br \/>22-23, 134 on October 24-25, 136 on October 26, 145 on October<br \/>27-28, 150 on October 29 through November 5, 140 on November 6-9,<br \/>135 on November 10-11, 145 and 140 on November 12-13, 135 on<br \/>November 14-15, then 140 on November 16-18, 135 and 140 on November<br \/>19-20, 145 on November 21-24, and 150 through the end of the month.<\/p>\n<p>Predicted planetary A index is 22, 14, 12, 10 and 8 on October<br \/>20-24, 5 on October 25-26, 8 on October 27-30, 10 and 12 on October<br \/>31 through November 1, 5 on November 2-8, 12 and 8 on November 9-10,<br \/>5 on November 11-12, 12 on November 13-14, then 10 and 8 on November<br \/>15-16, 5 on November 17-22, and 8 on November 23-26.<\/p>\n<p>Weekly Commentary on the Sun, the Magnetosphere, and the Earth&#8217;s<br \/>Ionosphere &#8211; October 19, 2023 from OK1HH:<br \/>\u00a0<br \/>&#8220;In the last ten days, the number of sunspot groups has dropped from<br \/>ten to three. At the same time the solar flux has dropped<br \/>significantly &#8211; from 166 to 135. The last two slightly larger solar<br \/>flares were observed on 16 October. The larger of the two occurred<br \/>in AR3467. The magnetic filament associated with it exploded and<br \/>blew a CME into space.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;According to NASA&#8217;s models, while it didn&#8217;t head directly for<br \/>Earth, it still likely hit it on October 18 (the original estimate<br \/>was that it would happen a day later). Which, while not enough to<br \/>cause a geomagnetic storm, was enough to reach an &#8216;unsettled&#8217; state.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;This was followed by an erratic MUF from 18 October and then a<br \/>decline on 19 October. These lines are written at a time when short<br \/>periods of G1 (Minor) geomagnetic storms are not yet ruled out on 19<br \/>October, with a possible duration into the first half of 20 October<br \/>UT.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;A return of larger sunspots and a rise in solar flux towards 150<br \/>can be expected by the end of the month.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Regarding 10 meter comments by K7SS in last week&#8217;s Propagation<br \/>Forecast bulletin, Angel Santana, WP3GW of Trujillo-Alto, Puerto<br \/>Rico responded, &#8220;I second Dan&#8217;s, K7SS comments on getting on the air<br \/>even if you are a Tech on 10 meters.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;I can attest that the band is in good shape: Can contact European<br \/>stations with ease even if my antenna is pointing to the US and when<br \/>it is 2pm local can still contact them when they are at their local<br \/>8-10 pm.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;My score in contests recently reflect more QSOs on 10 meters and<br \/>now that we are in contest season it is a great opportunity to get<br \/>on the air and see how many countries you can work.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;You can also check and hear SSTV signals on 28.680 MHz as of late<br \/>confirming that the band is truly live. And of course, the FM<br \/>(29-29.8 MHz) segment.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Dr. Julio Medina, NP3CW wrote:<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Sending some information of activity in 6M band since May to<br \/>October 2023.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Been copying stations from Japan, China, Africa, and many others<br \/>such as Philippines on FT8 early in the morning from 1200-1400 UTC<br \/>in FT8 in the 6m band.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Jon, N0JK wrote on October 6:<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The 6 meter sporadic-E &#8211; linking to TEP (trans equatorial<br \/>propagation) openings usually occur in the afternoon. But there was<br \/>a late evening Es &#8212; TEP opening on October 6.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Earlier in the afternoon October 6 I had some weak TEP from South<br \/>America to Kansas.\u00a0 It faded out around 0030 UTC. Then some<br \/>sporadic-E took place. Sporadic-E is rare in October, the only month<br \/>with less Es is March. That itself is noteworthy, and I logged<br \/>stations in Arizona and northern Mexico starting at 0100 UTC October<br \/>7 on 6 meter FT8. Then at 0133 UTC I began seeing a FT8 trace at<br \/>2,500 Hz. Then it decoded, and was Dale, CE2SV (FF47) sending a<br \/>report to W0SZ in Colorado. When they finished, I called CE2SV.<br \/>After a couple of calls Dale came back and we completed a contact at<br \/>0136 UTC. His signal varied from -10 dB to -17 dB.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;What is remarkable is I was operating from home using just an attic<br \/>dipole for an antenna. I also decoded CE3SOC and XQ3MCC. N0LL in<br \/>EM09 also worked some South American stations. This was &#8216;evening&#8217;<br \/>TEP, which typically has a shorter range than afternoon TEP. The<br \/>evening TEP signals usually have a distinctive &#8216;TEP flutter&#8217; sound<br \/>and sometimes don&#8217;t decode with FT8.\u00a0 Q65 can be a better digital<br \/>mode for evening TEP.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;I saw on the ON4KST 6 meter chat page N9PGG in North Carolina<br \/>worked FK8HA and VK4 stations. This was a sporadic-E link (on the<br \/>same Es I had to the south) out to the South Pacific.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;On another note &#8212; stations in Central America, the Caribbean and<br \/>northern South America have been making 6 meter Long Path contacts<br \/>with east Asia and Malaysia from 1200 &#8211; 1600 UTC the last couple of<br \/>mornings.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;6 meter long path is best with high solar flux and low geomagnetic<br \/>activity.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;2023-10-07 15:16 9Z4Y (FK90HM) 50.313.0 FT8 YB0MZI (OI33JQ) LoTW eQSL 18626 km<br \/>\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <br \/>&#8220;2023-10-07 15:00 9Z4Y (FK90HM) 50.313.0 FT8 YB0SAS (OI33JS) LoTW eQSL 18623 km<br \/>\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <br \/>&#8220;2023-10-07 14:54 9Z4Y (FK90HM) 50.313.0 FT8 YB0COU (OI33IU) LoTW eQSL 18611 km<br \/>\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <br \/>&#8220;2023-10-07 14:52 JA6GNL (PM53GO) 50.310.0 FT8 PJ4MM (FK52VE) LoTW 14545 km<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;FT8 CQ AS:<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;2023-10-07 14:38 PJ4MM (FK52VE) 50.313.0 FT8 4W\/JH2EUV (PI21) LoTW 18502 km +12&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>A video about predicting Solar Flares (Helioseismology):<\/p>\n<p><iframe loading=\"lazy\" title=\"Predicting Sunspots\" frameborder=\"0\" width=\"1110\" height=\"628\" src=\"https:\/\/geo.dailymotion.com\/player.html?video=x8oxp24&#038;\" allowfullscreen allow=\"autoplay; fullscreen; picture-in-picture\"><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p>A video about a Class X2 flare:<\/p>\n<p><iframe loading=\"lazy\" title=\"Sun Blasts Powerful X2-Class Solar Flare\" frameborder=\"0\" width=\"1110\" height=\"624\" src=\"https:\/\/geo.dailymotion.com\/player.html?video=x8oxpu2&#038;\" allowfullscreen allow=\"autoplay; fullscreen; picture-in-picture\"><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p>A video about a Cannibal CME:<\/p>\n<p><iframe loading=\"lazy\" title=\"Cannibal CME, Solar Flares and Sunspots\" frameborder=\"0\" width=\"1110\" height=\"624\" src=\"https:\/\/geo.dailymotion.com\/player.html?video=x8oumkk&#038;\" allowfullscreen allow=\"autoplay; fullscreen; picture-in-picture\"><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p>A report about Solar Cycle history:<\/p>\n<p>https:\/\/bit.ly\/3FpTqwN<br \/>\u00a0<br \/>The latest report from Dr. Tamitha Skov, WX6SWW:<\/p>\n<p><iframe loading=\"lazy\" title=\"Back to Back Solar Storms on Their Way | Solar Storm Forecast 19 October 2023\" width=\"1110\" height=\"624\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/8xHnsvBFTgE?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p>Send your tips, reports, observations, questions and comments to<br \/>k7ra@arrl.net. When reporting observations, don&#8217;t forget to tell us<br \/>which mode you were operating.<\/p>\n<p>An archive of past propagation bulletins is at<br \/> . More good<br \/>information and tutorials on propagation are at  .<\/p>\n<p>Also, check this article from September, 2002 QST:<\/p>\n<p>https:\/\/bit.ly\/3Rc8Njt<\/p>\n<p>Instructions for starting or ending email distribution of ARRL<br \/>bulletins are at  .<\/p>\n<p>Sunspot numbers for October 12 through 18, 2023 were 126, 91, 100,<br \/>92, 106, 57, and 54, with a mean of 89.4. 10.7 cm flux was 157.1,<br \/>149, 148.2, 144.6, 144, 137.3, and 135.3, with a mean of 145.1.<br \/>Estimated planetary A indices were 4, 13, 8, 4, 4, 3, and 9, with a<br \/>mean of 6.4. Middle latitude A index was 3, 11, 6, 2, 3, 2, and 8,<br \/>with a mean of 5.<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p><br \/>\n<br \/><a href=\"http:\/\/www.arrl.org\/news\/view\/the-k7ra-solar-update-800?rand=771671\">Source link <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>10\/20\/2023 Sunspot activity dropped dramatically this week, with only two newsunspot groups emerging, on October 14 and 16. Compared to last week, the average daily sunspot number slipped from144.1 to&hellip; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":771673,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-771873","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-ARRL"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/771873","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=771873"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/771873\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/771673"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=771873"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=771873"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=771873"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}