{"id":774115,"date":"2023-11-17T14:02:56","date_gmt":"2023-11-17T19:02:56","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=774115"},"modified":"2023-11-17T14:02:56","modified_gmt":"2023-11-17T19:02:56","slug":"the-k7ra-solar-update-6","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=774115","title":{"rendered":"The K7RA Solar Update"},"content":{"rendered":"<p> <br \/>\n<\/p>\n<div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<span class=\"date\">11\/17\/2023<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&#8220;ASWFC GEOMAGNETIC DISTURBANCE WARNING ISSUED AT 2306 UTC 16 NOVEMBER 2023 BY THE AUSTRALIAN SPACE WEATHER FORECASTING CENTRE.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Two recent CMEs associated with small solar filament eruptions are<br \/>expected to increase geomagnetic activity from mid 19-Nov to 20-Nov.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;INCREASED GEOMAGNETIC ACTIVITY EXPECTED DUE TO CORONAL MASS EJECTION FROM 19-20 NOVEMBER 2023.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Solar activity was lower this week, November 9-15, with average<br \/>daily sunspot numbers dropping from 89.7 to 80.1, and average daily<br \/>solar flux from 151.7 to 133.8.<\/p>\n<p>If these numbers seem a little low lately, we should check the<br \/>bulletin from the same week last year.<\/p>\n<p>In the November 18, 2022 bulletin average daily sunspot number<br \/>changed from 79.8 to 72.3, so a year later we are definitely still<br \/>trending higher.<\/p>\n<p>Geomagnetic indicators were also lower, planetary A index changing<br \/>from 22.3 to 10.4, and middle latitude A index from 14.6 to 8.6.<\/p>\n<p>A single new sunspot group appeared on November 10, another on<br \/>November 12, one more on November 13 and another on November 14.<br \/>\u00a0<br \/>Predicted solar flux is 118 and 120 on November 17-18,\u00a0 122 on<br \/>November 19-22, then 126, 135 and 135 on November 23-25, then 140,<br \/>148, and 152 November 26-28, 155 on November 29 through December 1,<br \/>then 152, 150, 148 and 145 on December 2-5, then 140 on December<br \/>6-8, then 145, 135, 130 and 125 on December 9-12, 120 on December<br \/>13-15, then 125, 128, 130 and 132 on December 16-19, 135 on December<br \/>20-22, 140 and 148 on December 23-24, and 152 on December 25-26.<\/p>\n<p>Predicted planetary A index is 8, 5, 15, 26 and 10 on November<br \/>17-21, then 5, 10, 18, 20 and 12 on November 22-26, 8 on November<br \/>27-28, 5 on November 29 through December 3, then 10, 16, 12 and 10<br \/>on December 4-7, 5 on December 8-9, 8 on December 10-13, then 5 on<br \/>December 14-18, then 15, 12, 18, 20, and 12 no December 19-23, and 8<br \/>on December 24-25.<\/p>\n<p>Weekly Commentary on the Sun, the Magnetosphere, and the Earth&#8217;s<br \/>Ionosphere November 17-23, 2023 from OK1HH:<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;During the first half of November, solar activity continuously<br \/>decreased, which was not what we would have liked for shortwave<br \/>propagation.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Even worse, there were relatively few geomagnetically quiet days &#8211;<br \/>only November 2, 3, 11 and 14.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;There were more days with higher geomagnetic activity: 4-8, 13 and<br \/>15 November. In addition, high levels of free electrons were present<br \/>in the ionosphere during relatively long periods (up to 4 November<br \/>and 7-12 November), which contributed to an increase in the<br \/>attenuation of passing electromagnetic waves.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Shortwave propagation conditions in the second half of the month<br \/>should definitely be better as solar activity is expected to<br \/>increase. In addition, with the exception of the last days of<br \/>November (when we expect a disturbance), we expect the geomagnetic<br \/>field to be mostly quiet to only moderately active.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;If we try to account for the 27-day recurrence, geomagnetically<br \/>active days with fluctuations in propagation should occur after<br \/>November 21 again, but this is really only a guess given the current<br \/>nature of the trend.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Check this site for an update on current conditions on various<br \/>bands:<\/p>\n<p>https:\/\/dr2w.de\/dx-propagation\/<br \/>\u00a0<br \/>From Dick Bingham, W7WKR, an article about Heliophysics and amateur<br \/>radio:<\/p>\n<p>https:\/\/bit.ly\/46jYf5O<\/p>\n<p>An article from NOAA about Sunspots\/Solar Cycle:<\/p>\n<p>https:\/\/bit.ly\/47iUpv2<\/p>\n<p>Send your tips, reports, observations, questions, and comments to<br \/>k7ra@arrl.net. When reporting observations, don&#8217;t forget to tell us<br \/>which mode you were operating.<\/p>\n<p>An archive of past propagation bulletins is at<br \/> . More good<br \/>information and tutorials on propagation are at  .<\/p>\n<p>Also, check this article from September, 2002 QST:<\/p>\n<p>https:\/\/bit.ly\/3Rc8Njt<\/p>\n<p>Instructions for starting or ending email distribution of ARRL<br \/>bulletins are at  .<\/p>\n<p>Sunspot numbers for November 9 through 15, 2023 were 93, 93, 85, 78,<br \/>85, 86, and 41, with a mean of 80.1. 10.7 cm flux was 138.7, 143.9,<br \/>141.5, 137.2, 132.7, 123.8, and 118.9, with a mean of 133.8.<br \/>Estimated planetary A indices were 12, 10, 5, 12, 16, 6, and 12,<br \/>with a mean of 10.4. Middle latitude A index was 8, 7, 4, 10, 15, 5,<br \/>and 11, with a mean of 8.6.<br \/>\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p><br \/>\n<br \/><a href=\"http:\/\/www.arrl.org\/news\/view\/the-k7ra-solar-update-804?rand=771671\">Source link <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>11\/17\/2023 &#8220;ASWFC GEOMAGNETIC DISTURBANCE WARNING ISSUED AT 2306 UTC 16 NOVEMBER 2023 BY THE AUSTRALIAN SPACE WEATHER FORECASTING CENTRE. &#8220;Two recent CMEs associated with small solar filament eruptions areexpected to&hellip; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":771673,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-774115","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-ARRL"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/774115","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=774115"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/774115\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/771673"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=774115"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=774115"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=774115"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}