{"id":775211,"date":"2023-12-08T05:55:52","date_gmt":"2023-12-08T10:55:52","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=775211"},"modified":"2023-12-08T05:55:52","modified_gmt":"2023-12-08T10:55:52","slug":"the-moon-may-enter-a-new-geological-period-thanks-to-human-activity","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=775211","title":{"rendered":"The moon may enter a new geological period thanks to human activity"},"content":{"rendered":"<p> <br \/>\n<\/p>\n<div id=\"\">\n<figure class=\"article-image-inline ArticleImage\" data-method=\"caption-shortcode\">\n<div class=\"ArticleImage__Wrapper\"><\/div><figcaption class=\"ArticleImageCaption\">\n<div class=\"ArticleImageCaption__CaptionWrapper\">\n<p class=\"ArticleImageCaption__Title\">US astronaut Buzz Aldrin on the surface of the moon in 1969<\/p>\n<p class=\"ArticleImageCaption__Credit\">NASA<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/p>\n<p>Humanity\u2019s influence on the moon is so great that we should define a new geological epoch, just as we are doing so on Earth with the creation of the Anthropocene, researchers argue. We should also create lunar \u201cnational parks\u201d to preserve areas for scientific study, they say.<\/p>\n<p>The Anthropocene is the name given to the epoch in which humans began having a significant impact on Earth\u2019s geology and ecosystems. The definition is still being agreed upon, but most researchers suggest Earth entered this period in 1950, marked by the presence of plutonium isotopes from nuclear weapons tests in sediment at the bottom of a relatively untouched lake in Canada.<\/p>\n<p>Now\u00a0<span class=\"TextRun SCXW245594414 BCX0\" lang=\"EN-US\" xml:lang=\"EN-US\" data-contrast=\"auto\"><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW245594414 BCX0\">Justin Allen Holcomb at the <span class=\"TextRun SCXW227493329 BCX0\" lang=\"EN-US\" xml:lang=\"EN-US\" data-contrast=\"auto\"><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW227493329 BCX0\">University of Kansas and his colleagues say the moon has also entered its own Anthropocene, as the effect of spacecraft landings, lunar rovers and human activity displace more surface regolith than natural processes such as meteoroid impacts.\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span class=\"js-content-prompt-opportunity\"\/><\/p>\n<p>Humans began having an effect on the moon in September 1959 when the Soviet Union crash-landed its Luna 2 probe on the surface, leaving a crater. India became the fourth country to make a soft landing on the moon this year, and a range of national and private missions are planned in the next few years. To date, w<span class=\"TextRun SCXW28791344 BCX0\" lang=\"EN-US\" xml:lang=\"EN-US\" data-contrast=\"none\"><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW28791344 BCX0\"><span class=\"TextRun SCXW171735919 BCX0\" lang=\"EN-US\" xml:lang=\"EN-US\" data-contrast=\"auto\"><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW171735919 BCX0\">e have caused <\/span><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW171735919 BCX0\">surface disturbances <\/span><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW171735919 BCX0\">in <\/span><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW171735919 BCX0\">at<\/span><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW171735919 BCX0\"> least<\/span> <span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW171735919 BCX0\">59<\/span>\u00a0<span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW171735919 BCX0\">locations<\/span><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW171735919 BCX0\"> on the moon\u2019s surface,<span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW177904015 BCX0\">\u00a0and discarded objects including<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW218352462 BCX0\">\u00a0<\/span><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW218352462 BCX0\">spacecraft components, <\/span><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW218352462 BCX0\">bags of human <\/span><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW218352462 BCX0\">excrement<\/span><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW218352462 BCX0\">, flags and golf balls.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Holcomb says that there is a lot of variation in estimates of the weight of human-made objects left on the moon, and the amount of regolith displaced by human activity, but that both are likely to drastically increase in coming years as colonisation and mining begins \u2013 and that this demands a discussion on the repercussions.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIt\u2019s just so focused on the amount of money or minerals we can get, but we really do need to slow down and talk about what the consequences are,\u201d he says. \u201cAnd I think other fields of science like anthropology, ecology, archaeology, should be involved in these discussions too.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Ingo Waldmann at University College London says the moon has certainly entered the Anthropocene as lunar geology is not very dramatic; weak lunar quakes happen sporadically, and water is deposited in the surface regolith by solar winds only over aeons.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIt\u2019s extremely slow,\u201d he says. \u201cThere might be an [asteroid] impact once once every couple of million years or so. But apart from that, not much happens. Just us walking on it has a bigger environmental impact than anything that would happen to the moon in hundreds of thousands of years.\u201d The current lunar geological division, the Copernican period, dates back to more than a billion years ago. By contrast, Earth has passed through around 15 geological periods in this time.<\/p>\n<p>Waldmann is concerned that missions such as as NASA\u2019s Artemis III, which aims to put astronauts on moon for the first time since Apollo 17 in 1972, will contaminate the lunar surface and make understanding its geology more difficult. He says there should be an international agreement for the creation of the equivalent of a \u201cnational park\u201d on the moon.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe lunar surface is the most pristine environment that we have access to, because the regolith builds up so slowly and erosion happens so slowly, that you do have the whole imprint of the solar system on the moon as geological records, which we don\u2019t have on the Earth. I think it is important for science.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Mark Sephton at Imperial College London supports the proposal, but says a balance is needed. \u201cYou want to at least have the equivalents of national parks that can be used in the future for deep interrogation and exploration, to understand the history of the moon,\u201d he says. \u201cBut at the same time, human beings need to explore and move out into the solar system.\u201d<\/p>\n<div class=\"JournalReference\" data-title=\"Nature Geoscience\" data-reference_type_overwrite=\"Journal reference\" data-doi=\"10.1038\/s41561-023-01347-4 \" data-method=\"shortcode\">\n<p class=\"JournalReference__Title\"><i>Nature Geoscience <\/i><br \/>\n                    DOI: 10.1038\/s41561-023-01347-4\n            <\/p>\n<\/div>\n<section class=\"ArticleTopics\">\n<p class=\"ArticleTopics__Heading\">Topics:<\/p>\n<\/section><\/div>\n<p><br \/>\n<br \/><a href=\"https:\/\/www.newscientist.com\/article\/2407185-the-moon-may-enter-a-new-geological-period-thanks-to-human-activity\/?utm_campaign=RSS%7CNSNS&#038;utm_source=NSNS&#038;utm_medium=RSS&#038;utm_content=space&#038;rand=772163\">Source link <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>US astronaut Buzz Aldrin on the surface of the moon in 1969 NASA Humanity\u2019s influence on the moon is so great that we should define a new geological epoch, just&hellip; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":775212,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[39],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-775211","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-new-scientist"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/775211","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=775211"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/775211\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/775212"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=775211"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=775211"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=775211"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}