{"id":775285,"date":"2023-12-10T11:41:49","date_gmt":"2023-12-10T16:41:49","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=775285"},"modified":"2023-12-10T11:41:49","modified_gmt":"2023-12-10T16:41:49","slug":"scientists-found-evidence-of-a-nearby-kilonova-3-5-million-years-ago","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=775285","title":{"rendered":"Scientists Found Evidence Of A Nearby Kilonova 3.5 Million Years Ago"},"content":{"rendered":"<p> <br \/>\n<\/p>\n<div>\n<p>Most of the times astronomers reported dramatic, cataclysmic events like neutron star mergers or the creation of a black hole; they are taking place light years away, typically in in another galaxy. While we can observe their destructive power through the light they emit, they have minimal impact on Earth. However, a relatively recent discovery of certain types of isotopes at the bottom of the ocean hints at one of these events happening fairly close to home. And it probably didn\u2019t happen all that long ago.<\/p>\n<p><span id=\"more-164716\"\/><\/p>\n<p>So, how can isotopes at the bottom of the ocean determine that a catastrophic event happened nearby recently? In the case of some elements, very few processes in the universe can create them naturally. Two of those \u2013 Fe-60 and Pu-244 \u2013 were found in ocean sediments dating back 3-4 million years ago.<\/p>\n<p>Fe-60 can, in theory, be created in a regular supernova. While still powerful, these events aren\u2019t the universe-shaking cataclysms we can see from far away. However, Pu-244 is thought to be created only in those extraordinary events. In particular, the creation of this plutonium isotope only happens in specific classes of supernovae, such as a kilonova or the merger of at least one neutron star with something else.<\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-embed is-type-video is-provider-youtube wp-block-embed-youtube wp-embed-aspect-16-9 wp-has-aspect-ratio\">\n<p>\n<span class=\"embed-youtube\" style=\"text-align:center; display: block;\"><iframe loading=\"lazy\" title=\"Kilonova! Gravitational Waves AND Radiation Detected From a Neutron Star Collision\" width=\"1110\" height=\"624\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/E8pY6ysj8Lo?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/span>\n<\/p><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">Fraser discusses our discovery of a kilonova.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Scientists have already looked at the ratios of these two isotopes and determined that a single binary neutron star merger wouldn\u2019t have created the observed data. However, a new paper from physicists at the Universita di Trento found that, with a specific debris ejection pattern and a certain tilt of the merger event as it happened, the ratio of iron to plutonium isotopes could be explained by a phenomenon known as a \u201ckilonova,\u201d which is created when either two neutron stars or a neutron star and a black hole collide.<\/p>\n<p>A critical feature of the data was that these isotopes hadn\u2019t yet decayed. Pu-244 has a half-life of 81 million years, while Fe-60\u2019s is only 1.5 million years. Combining the known age of the sediment with the available half-life of these elements allowed the scientists to determine the ratio that lies at the heart of the paper.<\/p>\n<p>Other papers have proposed that different rare types of supernovae could have created the plutonium\/iron ratio in the sediment sample. These include events like a magneto-rotational supernova or collapsar; however, the paper shows that neither of these could have been the source.\u00a0<\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-embed is-type-video is-provider-youtube wp-block-embed-youtube wp-embed-aspect-16-9 wp-has-aspect-ratio\">\n<p>\n<span class=\"embed-youtube\" style=\"text-align:center; display: block;\"><iframe loading=\"lazy\" title=\"How a Cosmic Kilonova Can Create Gold | How the Universe Works\" width=\"1110\" height=\"624\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/o9_TArqcZ74?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/span>\n<\/p><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">Here\u2019s an explanation of how a kilonova created heavy elements.<br \/>Credit \u2013 Science Channel YouTube Channel<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>That leaves a kilonova as the most likely source, but what about the research that found it impossible to explain the isotope ratio? Several factors play into the scenario where a kilonova explanation begins to make sense. First, one type of gravitational collapse during the merger creates strong \u201cspiral-wave\u201d winds, which eject much more matter from the kilonova.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Along with that gravitational collapse, neutrino bombardment of the eject could create the Pu-244 in quantities similar to those found on the ocean floor. The researchers ran a series of simulations that proved such a ratio was possible \u2013 but found it only was if the kilonova was slightly askew with respect to Earth \u2013 the ratio only made sense if the wind from the mid-to-high-latitudes were what hit our planet.<\/p>\n<p>It, therefore, seems that a single kilonova could explain the existence of Fe-60 and Pu-244 in our oceans. And since those isotopes showed up in sediment that was created between 3 and 4 million years ago, it seems likely that the kilonova happened then. But how far away was it?<\/p>\n<p>To calculate that, the researchers calculated the different spreads they would expect for each element based on the wind speed created by the kilonova. The answer, it seems, was about 150-200 parsecs away \u2013 about 500-600 light years. That\u2019s basically right in our backyard in astronomical terms.<\/p>\n<p>The good news is that, obviously, this event didn\u2019t cause the end of all life on Earth. And we don\u2019t see any good candidates for such a dramatic event nearby anytime in the next few million years. But research like this provides a good reminder that the universe is dangerous, and sometimes dangerous things happen uncomfortably close to our pale blue dot.<\/p>\n<p>Learn More:<br \/>Chiesa et al \u2013 Did a kilonova set off in our Galactic backyard 3.5 Myr ago?<br \/>UT \u2013 A Kilonova Simulated in 3D<br \/>UT \u2013 This Binary System is Destined to Become a Kilonova<br \/>UT \u2013 The Expanding Debris Cloud From the Kilonova Tells the Story of What Happens When Neutron Stars Collide<\/p>\n<p>Lead Image:<br \/>Artist\u2019s impression of a neutron star merger.<br \/>Credit \u2013 University of Warwick \/ Mark Garlick<\/p>\n<div class=\"sharedaddy sd-block sd-like jetpack-likes-widget-wrapper jetpack-likes-widget-unloaded\" id=\"like-post-wrapper-24000880-164716-6575e738b3510\" data-src=\"https:\/\/widgets.wp.com\/likes\/#blog_id=24000880&amp;post_id=164716&amp;origin=www.universetoday.com&amp;obj_id=24000880-164716-6575e738b3510\" data-name=\"like-post-frame-24000880-164716-6575e738b3510\" data-title=\"Like or Reblog\">\n<h3 class=\"sd-title\">Like this:<\/h3>\n<p><span class=\"button\"><span>Like<\/span><\/span> <span class=\"loading\">Loading&#8230;<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span class=\"sd-text-color\"\/><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p><br \/>\n<br \/><a href=\"https:\/\/www.universetoday.com\/164716\/scientists-found-evidence-of-a-nearby-kilonova-3-5-million-years-ago\/?rand=772204\">Source link <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Most of the times astronomers reported dramatic, cataclysmic events like neutron star mergers or the creation of a black hole; they are taking place light years away, typically in in&hellip; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":775286,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[13],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-775285","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-genaero"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/775285","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=775285"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/775285\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/775286"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=775285"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=775285"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=775285"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}