{"id":775305,"date":"2023-12-11T09:25:50","date_gmt":"2023-12-11T14:25:50","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=775305"},"modified":"2023-12-11T09:25:50","modified_gmt":"2023-12-11T14:25:50","slug":"the-k7ra-solar-update-9","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=775305","title":{"rendered":"The K7RA Solar Update"},"content":{"rendered":"<p> <br \/>\n<\/p>\n<div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<span class=\"date\">12\/11\/2023<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Six new sunspot groups emerged over this reporting week (November 30<br \/>to December 6).<\/p>\n<p>Last week, using the previous week&#8217;s Propagation Forecast bulletin<br \/>as a template, the averages were not updated, although all the<br \/>correct data was there.<\/p>\n<p>So instead of average daily sunspot number of 83.3, it was actually<br \/>165.9, which this week dropped to 121.1.<\/p>\n<p>Instead of average daily solar flux of 146, it was actually 181.5,<br \/>which this week declined to 146.5.<\/p>\n<p>Instead of average daily planetary A index of 10.1, it was actually<br \/>11.6, which this week rose to 17.1. Instead of average middle<br \/>latitude A index of 7.3 it was 9, rising this week to 11.4.<\/p>\n<p>Predicted solar flux is 135, 130, 130 and 135 on December 8-11, 137<br \/>on December 12-15, 140 and 150 on December 16-17, 160 on December<br \/>18-26, then 155, 150, 145, and 140 on December 27-30, then 136, 134<br \/>and 130 on December 31 through January 2, 2024, and 132 on January<br \/>3-5, then 130 and 135 on January 6-7, then 140 on January 8-12.<\/p>\n<p>Predicted planetary A index is 5 on December 8-9, 8 on December<br \/>10-11, 5 on December 12-17, then 15, 25, 8, 5, 20 and 10 on December<br \/>18-23, 5 on December 24-30, then 25, 10 and 8 on December 31 through<br \/>January 2, 2024, and 5 on January 3-6, then 10 and 8 on January 7-8,<br \/>and 5 on January 9-13.<\/p>\n<p>Weekly Commentary on the Sun, the Magnetosphere, and the Earth&#8217;s<br \/>Ionosphere, December 8-14, 2023 from OK1HH:<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;After passing through a twenty-seven day low in mid-November, solar<br \/>activity began to increase. Slowly at first, then steeply in recent<br \/>days. What was common to the whole period was that the predictions<br \/>of further developments were not fulfilled. Shortwave conditions<br \/>were, with a few exceptions, worse than expected.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;In the second half of last week, the Earth&#8217;s magnetic field was<br \/>calm despite the eruption of a magnetic filament on the Sun on<br \/>November 16, which threw a CME almost directly toward the Earth. We<br \/>expected the CME to arrive on November 19. On the contrary, quiet<br \/>days followed on November 19-20.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Then, despite seven new sunspot groups and calm in the Earth&#8217;s<br \/>magnetosphere, propagation did not improve until November 20.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Improvement occurred on 21 November, when the onset of the<br \/>geomagnetic disturbance was accompanied by two positive phases of<br \/>development with increases in MUF and an overall improvement in<br \/>conditions (at intervals of 1000-1300 UTC and 1600-1900 UTC).<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The following evolution could be expected &#8211; there was a<br \/>deterioration of conditions in the negative phase of the disturbance<br \/>development on 22 November. However, the deterioration was<br \/>short-lived, after which, thanks to the increasing solar activity,<br \/>an improvement occurred already on 23 November.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Although solar activity continues to increase, there is a coronal<br \/>hole near the five active regions in the northeast quadrant of the<br \/>solar disk. This configuration will cause further increases in solar<br \/>wind speed and therefore more frequent alternation of better and<br \/>worse days.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>From &#8220;Universe Today&#8221; a story about a big, big solar storm in 1872:<\/p>\n<p>https:\/\/bit.ly\/3RgUWqL<\/p>\n<p>A story about a big coronal hole:<\/p>\n<p>https:\/\/bit.ly\/487quGd<\/p>\n<p>From &#8220;Science Alert&#8221; another article about a big hole on the Sun:<\/p>\n<p>https:\/\/bit.ly\/41adYDC<\/p>\n<p>From &#8220;EarthSky&#8221; a new region on the Sun:<\/p>\n<p>https:\/\/bit.ly\/3RxtCWG<\/p>\n<p>Don&#8217;t forget, the ARRL 10 meter contest is THIS weekend!<\/p>\n<p>https:\/\/www.arrl.org\/10-meter<\/p>\n<p>Send your tips, reports, observations, questions and comments to<br \/>k7ra@arrl.net. When reporting observations, don&#8217;t forget to tell us<br \/>which mode you were operating.<\/p>\n<p>An archive of past propagation bulletins is at<br \/> . More good<br \/>information and tutorials on propagation are at  .<\/p>\n<p>Also, check this article from September, 2002 QST:<\/p>\n<p>https:\/\/bit.ly\/3Rc8Njt<\/p>\n<p>Instructions for starting or ending email distribution of ARRL<br \/>bulletins are at  .<\/p>\n<p>Sunspot numbers for November 30 through December 6, 2023 were 138,<br \/>140, 92, 107, 113, 133, and 125, with a mean of 121.1. 10.7 cm flux<br \/>was 166.5, 162, 148.2, 139.2, 137.8, 141.6, and 129.9, with a mean<br \/>of 146.5. Estimated planetary A indices were 5, 56, 14, 11, 9, 15,<br \/>and 10, with a mean of 14.1. Middle latitude A index was 4, 30, 11,<br \/>10, 9, 9, and 7, with a mean of 7.3.<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p><br \/>\n<br \/><a href=\"http:\/\/www.arrl.org\/news\/view\/the-k7ra-solar-update-807?rand=771671\">Source link <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>12\/11\/2023 Six new sunspot groups emerged over this reporting week (November 30to December 6). Last week, using the previous week&#8217;s Propagation Forecast bulletinas a template, the averages were not updated,&hellip; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":771673,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-775305","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-ARRL"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/775305","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=775305"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/775305\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/771673"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=775305"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=775305"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=775305"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}